Enhanced automated control scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smart device control systems, such as thermostats, often rely on rules-and-exceptions-based learning approaches that can produce inefficient or erratic schedules due to overemphasis on initial interactions, leading to unsuitable temperature settings that fail to accurately adapt to user preferences.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a preference function that maps relative weights to device settings based on user behavior, allowing for the generation and optimization of automated schedules that better fit user preferences over time, incorporating factors like satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and behavioral patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a rules-and-exceptions-based learning approach is used to generate automated schedules, then the device can learn from user interactions, but it produces errant results and inefficient schedules due to overemphasis on initial interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to learn from user interactionsVSAvoidaccuracy of learned schedules
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-heating or pre-cooling spaces before occupants arrive, based on learned schedules. This allows the system to proactively prepare environments rather than reactively responding to temperature adjustments, improving both reliability and energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user manual adjustments to temperature are used to refine and update the learned schedules. This continuous feedback loop allows the system to correct errant results and improve schedule accuracy over time, resolving the reliability issue while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the system generates energy-efficient schedules, then energy consumption is reduced, but user comfort may be compromised by forcing efficient settings on users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts temperature setpoints based on the interplay between energy efficiency goals and user comfort preferences. Rather than forcing fixed efficient settings, the system adapts schedules to accommodate user needs while minimizing energy consumption, achieving both objectives simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The learned schedule acts as an intermediary between energy efficiency requirements and user comfort preferences. It translates user behavior patterns into optimized temperature profiles that balance energy savings with comfort, preventing the need to force inefficient settings on users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system frequently changes temperature setpoints to adapt to user preferences, then user comfort is improved, but system stability and predictability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to user preferencesVSAvoidschedule stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic temperature changes based on learned schedules that reflect typical user patterns. Rather than making frequent reactive adjustments, the system establishes stable periodic routines that adapt to user preferences while maintaining predictability and system stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9772116B2Enhanced automated control scheduling
Publication Date: 2017.09.26 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9772116B2 patent drawing
  • US9772116B2 patent drawing
  • US9772116B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, an electronic device may include storage containing processor-executable instructions, a preference function that maps weights indicating likely user preferences for the range of values of a device setting in relation to a range of values of a variable, and a current automated device control schedule configured to control the device setting of the electronic device in relation to the variable, and a processor. The instructions may cause the processor to determine the current automated device control schedule based on the preference function by detecting user behavior that indicates satisfaction or dissatisfaction with values of the device setting in relation to the variable, updating the preference function based on the detected user behavior, and determining the current automated device control schedule by comparing a number of candidate device control schedules against the weights of the preference function and selecting the candidate with the highest score.