Prefetch Profile Bit Propagation for Cache Pollution Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing prefetching mechanisms in computing systems face inefficiencies due to coarse granularity in profiling data collection, which limits their ability to optimize prefetching at a code region level, leading to potential cache pollution and reduced performance, especially in multi-core systems.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid hardware/software mechanism that collects prefetching profile data at a code region granularity, filtering events to associate metrics with specific code regions, allowing for more precise optimization of prefetching and dynamic adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If prefetching mechanisms are used to reduce memory latency, then data access speed is improved, but cache pollution and resource interference occur leading to reduced performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access speedVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prefetching mechanism into distinct components: a prefetching engine that generates requests, a prefetch queue that buffers them, and a data cache that executes them. This segmentation allows independent optimization and control of each component, enabling the system to reduce memory latency while managing cache pollution through targeted interventions at specific segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control of prefetching through performance monitoring and adaptive adjustment. The system dynamically adjusts prefetching aggressiveness based on observed performance metrics, transitioning between restrained and aggressive prefetching modes to optimize the balance between data access speed and system performance, preventing cache pollution when prefetching is too aggressive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If prefetching is performed with high aggressiveness to maximize data availability, then memory latency is reduced, but cache capacity is wasted and useful data are displaced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory latencyVSAvoidcache capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through performance monitoring that tracks the effectiveness of prefetching operations. By monitoring whether prefetched data are actually used and measuring the impact on cache utilization, the system receives feedback that guides adaptive adjustment of prefetching aggressiveness, preventing waste of cache capacity while maintaining reduced memory latency when beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters of the prefetching mechanism based on system state and performance metrics. By dynamically adjusting parameters such as prefetching aggressiveness and queue management strategies, the system optimizes the balance between reducing memory latency and preserving cache capacity for useful data, avoiding the trade-off of either extreme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If phase/interval-based profiling is used to collect prefetching metrics, then performance overhead is reduced, but profiling granularity is too coarse for effective optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofiling complexityVSAvoidprofiling granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the code into fine-grained regions and associates prefetching events with specific regions rather than using coarse phase/interval boundaries. This segmentation enables precise measurement of prefetching effectiveness at the code region level, providing detailed profiling information that guides targeted optimizations while maintaining manageable profiling complexity through systematic region identification and event association.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If prefetching requests are made for multiple cores in a chip multiprocessor, then data availability is improved, but resource interference increases and performance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-core data availabilityVSAvoidresource interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prefetching system into core-specific prefetch queues and engines, with each core having dedicated resources for generating and managing its prefetch requests. This segmentation reduces resource interference between cores while maintaining improved data availability, as each core's prefetching operations are isolated and can be independently optimized based on its specific workload characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10013326B2Propagating a prefetching profile bit from a prefetch queue to a data cache to indicate that a line was prefetched in response to an instruction within a code region
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 INTEL CORP
  • US10013326B2 patent drawing
  • US10013326B2 patent drawing
  • US10013326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combination of hardware and software collect profile data for asynchronous events, at code region granularity. An exemplary embodiment is directed to collecting metrics for prefetching events, which are asynchronous in nature. Instructions that belong to a code region are identified using one of several alternative techniques, causing a profile bit to be set for the instruction, as a marker. Each line of a data block that is prefetched is similarly marked. Events corresponding to the profile data being collected and resulting from instructions within the code region are then identified. Each time that one of the different types of events is identified, a corresponding counter is incremented. Following execution of the instructions within the code region, the profile data accumulated in the counters are collected, and the counters are reset for use with a new code region.