Preform Cover Glass Shape Prediction for Curved Glass Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in manufacturing curved cover glass is the inability to accurately predict the shape of preform cover glass, leading to increased manufacturing costs due to extended product development periods and design of experiments.

Innovation Solution

A preform cover glass shape prediction device and method using a machine learning model that processes characteristic data from curved and flat corner parts of cover and preform glasses to generate accurate design specifications for molding target curved cover glasses, employing data preprocessing, augmentation, and synthetic data generation to improve model accuracy and reduce computational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional manufacturing methods are used without shape prediction, then manufacturing process simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to accurately predict preform cover glass shape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreform cover glass shape accuracyVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses machine learning models to create virtual copies and simulations of the thermoforming process. Instead of physically experimenting with each preform design, the system creates digital replicas that can be tested and optimized virtually, then applies these learned patterns to predict the shape of target preform cover glasses accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs shape prediction before actual manufacturing by training machine learning models on historical data and using them to forecast the optimal preform cover glass shape. This preliminary prediction allows manufacturers to prepare accurate designs in advance, avoiding trial-and-error during production and improving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If design of experiments is increased to improve shape prediction accuracy, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity deteriorates due to extended product development periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover glass shape accuracyVSAvoidproduct development speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical design of experiments with computational machine learning models. Instead of manually creating and testing multiple preform designs through traditional DOE methods, the system uses trained AI models to predict optimal shapes computationally, dramatically reducing development time while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the approach by changing from iterative physical experimentation to direct computational prediction. The machine learning models have learned the relationship between input parameters (curved cover glass specifications) and output parameters (preform shape characteristics), allowing direct calculation of optimal designs without time-consuming physical trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If more design of experiments is conducted to predict preform shape accurately, then manufacturing precision improves, but loss of time increases due to extended development periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreform cover glass shape prediction accuracyVSAvoidproduct development time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs comprehensive shape prediction analysis in advance by training machine learning models on extensive historical data before actual product development. This preliminary action creates a ready-to-use prediction system that can quickly determine optimal preform shapes for new designs without requiring time-consuming experimental iterations during the development phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates virtual training datasets and digital models that replicate real-world thermoforming behavior. By copying and analyzing historical manufacturing data through machine learning, the system learns optimal shape relationships without requiring additional physical experiments, thus eliminating time loss while improving prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250390615A1Preform cover glass shape prediction device and method
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US20250390615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390615A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A preform cover glass shape prediction device for predicting a shape of a preform cover glass, the device includes a preform cover glass prediction model generator trained to obtain input data representing a training curved cover glass and a training preform cover glass, to generate cover glass characteristic data based on the input data, and to generate a predicted design specification of a target preform cover glass based on the cover glass characteristic data, and a preform cover glass shape predictor configured to generate a predicted design specification for a preform cover glass corresponding to a target curved cover glass based on the cover glass characteristic data and characteristic data of the target curved cover glass.