3D Printed Preform Pressure Sintering Complex Shapes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sintering techniques face challenges in achieving uniform densification and easy mold removal for complex-shaped parts, particularly due to heterogeneity and difficulties with undercuts and tapers, leading to material loss and geometric defects.

Innovation Solution

A method combining 3D additive printing and uniaxial pressure sintering, where a preform is created using porous or pulverulent materials and placed within a mold filled with sacrificial material, allowing for controlled densification and easy extraction by applying uniaxial pressure, with optional interface layers to prevent interaction and ensure uniform densification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If uniaxial pressure sintering is used to densify complex-shaped parts, then the sintering process is simplified and productivity is improved, but heterogeneity of densification occurs due to substantial differences in thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesintering process efficiencyVSAvoiddensification uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a deformable interface layer with specific mechanical properties (elastic modulus between 0.1 to 10 GPa) that locally adapts to different thickness regions of the complex-shaped preform. This layer provides localized compliance to thick regions while maintaining contact in thin regions, enabling uniform pressure distribution and homogeneous densification throughout the part.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The deformable interface layer acts as an intermediary between the rigid mold counterface and the preform. It mediates the stress transmission by deforming locally in thick regions to accommodate geometry variations, thereby transforming the uniaxial pressure into a more uniformly distributed compressive stress field across the entire preform surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional molds are used for complex shapes with undercuts, then mold removal becomes difficult and material loss occurs, but using multiple counterforms increases device complexity and assembly steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold removal easeVSAvoidnumber of counterforms
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a single reusable rigid mold counterface combined with a consumable deformable interface layer. The interface layer is depleted or removed after each sintering cycle, eliminating the need for complex mold designs with multiple detachable counterforms. This approach simplifies the molding system while enabling easy part extraction from complex geometries including undercuts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system separates the mold into two functional components: a rigid structural counterface that maintains geometric precision, and a deformable interface layer that adapts to complex preform geometries. This segmentation allows the rigid mold to remain simple while the deformable layer handles the complexity of undercut accommodation during the sintering process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables precise, homogeneous densification and simplified part removal, reducing material loss and geometric defects, while allowing for complex shapes and varying thicknesses without the need for multiple molds or complex assembly processes.

Implementation Method 1

consolidating a volume of ceramic, polymer or metal powders in a conductive mold in order to rapidly obtain finely microstructured dense materials. This consolidation is achieved by means of the simultaneous application of a load (under high uniaxial pressure exerted on the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

heating provided by a high-intensity pulsed direct current in the mold, of the order of 500 to 10000 A, the total sintering of the powders then being obtained in only a few minutes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

high-pressure spark sintering known as SPS (spark plasma sintering)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpark plasma sintering: Spark Plasma Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS12179262B2Method for manufacturing a part of complex shape by pressure sintering starting from a preform
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 NORIMAT
  • US12179262B2 patent drawing
  • US12179262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to a method for manufacturing a part of complex shape (3) by successive deposition of layers according to a technique of 3D additive printing and pressure sintering, comprising the following steps: an initial step of producing a model (1) from a material chosen from a porous or pulverulent material based on a metal alloy, a ceramic, a composite material and a lost material by formation of successive layers deposited according to the digitally controlled 3D additive printing technique, followed by a step of introducing a preform (1) made of porous or pulverulent material to be densified, derived from the model (1), into a mold (2) filled with a sacrificial porous or pulverulent material (13) in addition to the preform (1), the uniaxial densifying pressure sintering (10) then being applied to the mold (2) in order to form the part (3) which is finally extracted from the mold (2).