Optical Fiber Preform Sintering Helium Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost of helium consumption in the conventional sintering process of optical fiber preforms due to its higher cost compared to other inert gases, leading to increased manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A method involving preheating of the optical fiber preform in a sintering chamber filled with helium and chlorine gas, followed by first downfeeding into a sintering furnace with helium and chlorine, pulling out in chlorine and either nitrogen or helium, and subsequent second downfeeding with nitrogen and chlorine, which reduces helium usage and maintains an inert atmosphere to minimize OH content and improve heat transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional sintering using high consumption of helium is performed, then sintering quality is maintained, but manufacturing cost increases due to high helium consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesintering qualityVSAvoidhelium consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The sintering process is divided into multiple sequential stages: preheating stage, first sintering stage, second sintering stage, and cooling stage. Each stage uses different gas compositions and flow rates, segmenting the helium usage to only critical phases while using cheaper gases (nitrogen, air) in non-critical phases, thereby reducing overall helium consumption while maintaining sintering quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes gas composition parameters throughout the sintering process. Helium concentration is high during preheating and first sintering stages, then reduced during second sintering and cooling stages by introducing nitrogen and air. This parameter change strategy maintains quality where needed while reducing costly helium usage elsewhere

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If helium consumption is reduced, then manufacturing cost decreases, but sintering process control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelium consumptionVSAvoidprocess control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The gas flow system is made dynamic with automated control that adjusts helium, nitrogen, and air flow rates based on the current process stage. The system transitions from static high-helium atmosphere to dynamic multi-gas composition control, making the process easier to operate while reducing helium consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through temperature sensors and gas flow meters that monitor process conditions and automatically adjust gas composition. This feedback mechanism maintains precise process control even with reduced helium levels, eliminating the difficulty associated with manual helium consumption management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If multi-stage sintering process is implemented, then helium consumption is reduced, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelium consumptionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple gas delivery systems into a unified controlled atmosphere system where helium, nitrogen, and air flows are coordinated through a single control unit. This merging approach manages the multi-stage complexity systematically while achieving helium reduction goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces helium consumption, lowers long-term costs, enhances operational ease, and achieves a more uniform diameter of the optical fiber preform while maintaining the quality of the sintering process.

Implementation Method 1

preheating of the optical fiber preform enables diffusion of helium gas inside the optical fiber preform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

nitrogen gas and chlorine gas maintains an inert atmosphere to reduce OH content in the optical fiber preform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

The sintering of the preform produces a dense and non-porous preform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentEP3778505A1Method for sintering of an optical fibre preform
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
  • EP3778505A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3778505A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3778505A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method for sintering of an optical fiber preform (106). The method includes preheating of the optical fiber preform (106) in a sintering chamber (104). In addition, the method includes first downfeeding of the optical fiber preform (106) into a sintering furnace (110) in the presence of helium gas and chlorine gas. The first downfeeding of the optical fiber preform (106) facilitates sintering of an outer layer of the optical fiber preform (106). Further, the method includes pulling out the optical fiber preform from the sintering furnace in presence of chlorine gas and at least one of nitrogen gas and helium gas. Further, the method includes second down feeding of the optical fiber preform (106) in the sintering furnace (104) in the presence of nitrogen gas and chlorine gas. The second downfeeding of the optical fiber preform (106) facilitates sintering of the optical fiber preform (106).