Premises Access Authentication Using Weighted Multi-Factor Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing premises monitoring systems lack robust and flexible authentication methods for granting access, especially in dynamic scenarios involving varying security levels and visitor categories.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic multi-factor authentication system that evaluates multiple authentication factors, including facial recognition, mobile device presence, verbal passcodes, and keypad entries, weighted based on reliability and security conditions, to determine access validity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional numeric keypad authentication is used, then ease of operation is improved, but security and reliability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adjusts the required authentication factors based on real-time conditions such as visitor category, time of day, and security alerts. The system transitions from static numeric code authentication to a dynamic multi-factor authentication process that adapts its security requirements, combining ease of operation with enhanced reliability through conditional authentication pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes authentication parameters by introducing multiple authentication factors (facial recognition, mobile device detection, verbal passcodes) with different weights. The authentication threshold and required factors are modified based on visitor profiles and security conditions, transforming the single-parameter numeric code system into a multi-parameter authentication framework that balances usability and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple authentication factors are required, then security and reliability are improved, but device complexity and operation difficulty are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into distinct functional modules: facial recognition module, mobile device detection module, verbal passcode module, and weighting module. Each module independently evaluates one authentication factor, and the results are combined through a weighted scoring system. This segmentation manages complexity by organizing multiple authentication factors into separate, manageable components rather than a monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication system achieves multi-functionality by integrating multiple authentication methods (facial recognition, mobile device detection, verbal passcodes, numeric keypads) into a single unified platform. The system can adaptively select and combine different authentication factors based on the situation, making one system serve multiple security purposes and reducing the need for separate authentication systems for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If authentication factors are weighted based on reliability, then authentication precision is improved, but device complexity and computation are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication precisionVSAvoidcomputation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces weighting parameters for each authentication factor based on their relative reliability and security importance. Facial recognition, mobile device detection, and verbal passcodes are assigned higher weights compared to numeric keypads. These weight parameters are integrated into the authentication scoring formula, allowing the system to precisely evaluate authentication requests by considering both the type and reliability of each factor without requiring complex computational models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12608991B2Dynamic multi-factor authentication for premises access
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION
  • US12608991B2 patent drawing
  • US12608991B2 patent drawing
  • US12608991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and devices are described herein. An example system is disclosed. The system includes at least one computing device configured to communicate with a premises monitoring system located at a premises. The at least one computing device is further configured to determine that a plurality of authentication factors associated with a person at the premises monitoring system have been satisfied, determine a respective weight of a plurality of weights for each of the plurality of authentication factors, determine a security factor for the premises monitoring system, calculate an authentication value for the person based on the security factor and the plurality of weights for the plurality of authentication factors, determine that the authentication value meets a predefined authentication threshold, and in response to determining that the authentication value meets the predefined authentication threshold, deem the person authenticated.