Premix Burner Mixture Control with Variable Intake Cross Section

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control devices for premix gas burners face challenges in achieving precise air/gas ratio control across a wide range of thermal flow rates with reduced energy consumption, leading to high head losses and excessive noise at high flow rates, and are prone to shutter blockages due to complex construction and limited operating ranges.

Innovation Solution

A device with a control unit that regulates the gas flow rate using an electrically-controlled solenoid valve and a second regulator with a movable shutter, varying the intake duct's cross section as a function of fan speed to maintain constant head losses and reduce noise, while minimizing construction complexity and shutter blockage risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the fan speed is increased to handle high flow rates, then the thermal power output is improved, but the head losses increase and noise becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal power outputVSAvoidhead losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter is made movable rather than fixed, allowing it to dynamically adjust the cross-sectional area of the intake duct based on operating conditions. This dynamic adjustment optimizes airflow characteristics across different fan speeds, reducing head losses at high flow rates while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional area of the intake duct is changed by moving the shutter to different positions. This parameter change allows the system to adapt to varying flow rates, reducing turbulence and head losses when the fan operates at high speeds for maximum thermal power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a hinged shutter is used to vary the intake duct cross section, then the operating range is improved, but the device complexity increases and shutter blockages occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating rangeVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge mechanism is removed from the shutter design. Instead of being hinged to the duct wall, the shutter is designed to move freely within the duct cross-section, supported only at its ends by guide elements. This extraction of the hinge simplifies the construction and eliminates the complexity and blockage risks associated with hinged mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The shutter design is simplified by copying only the essential function (varying cross-sectional area) without the complex hinged mechanism. The shutter is a simple movable element that can be positioned at different locations, replicating the adaptive function with minimal structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If the gas valve is designed as a passive follower element, then the device complexity is reduced, but the air/gas ratio control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol architecture simplicityVSAvoidair/gas ratio control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates feedback by continuously monitoring the actual gas flow and comparing it with the desired flow corresponding to the fan speed. The gas valve is actively adjusted based on this feedback to maintain the correct air/gas ratio, achieving precision control while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The passive mechanical follower mechanism is replaced with an actively controlled valve system that responds to control signals based on operating conditions. This substitution allows for more precise control of the air/gas ratio while maintaining simplicity through electronic or pneumatic actuation rather than complex mechanical linkages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables precise control of the air/gas ratio across a wide range of flow rates, reducing energy consumption and noise, and increases the flexibility and reliability of the burner by maintaining constant head losses and minimizing maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

the gas valve (7) is an electrically-controlled solenoid valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 2

The mixing system determines the negative pressure to which the air passing through is subjected to and hence the pressure in the mixing zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

The fan generates an operating flow in a direction of flow, oriented from the inlet to the outlet, and an operating pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3540311B1Device for controlling a fuel-oxidizer mixture for premix gas burners
Publication Date: 2022.05.18 BERTELLI & PARTNERS
  • EP3540311B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3540311B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3540311B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Described is a device (1) for controlling a fuel-oxidizer mixture for a premix gas burner (100), comprising an intake duct (2), which defines a cross section for the passage of a fluid inside the duct (2) and includes an inlet (201), a mixing zone (202) and an outlet (203), an injection duct (3), connected to the intake duct (2) in the mixing zone (202), a monitoring device (4), configured for generating a control signal (401), representing a combustion state in the burner (100), a gas regulating valve (7), positioned along the injection duct (3), a fan (8), positioned in the intake duct (2) for generating therein an operating flow in an inflow direction (V), a control unit (5), configured to control the rotation speed of the fan, a regulator (9), coupled with the intake duct (2) for varying the cross section. The control unit (5) is configured for controlling the gas regulating valve (7) in real time.