Prepress Color Match Verification for Print Jobs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current color management systems fail to accurately match colors across different devices and printing processes, leading to mismatches that are often discovered only during printing, causing costly and time-consuming rework. Additionally, existing remote proofing methods do not adequately mimic the color architecture of the target printer, resulting in inaccurate previews.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a prototypical color transformation to identify and correct color mismatches by transforming source colors into a common color space, applying the target printer's color transformation path, and ensuring color consistency across objects, with options for automatic correction or user intervention, and remote proofing that accounts for job and printer settings to produce accurate previews.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If ICC-based color management is used to transform colors between devices, then color translation capability is improved, but color match accuracy deteriorates when different source color definitions take different transformation paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor translation capabilityVSAvoidcolor match accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing color match verification and correction during the prepress stage, before actual printing occurs. The system proactively identifies color mismatches by comparing transformed colors against expected values and corrects them beforehand, preventing costly rework during production while maintaining accurate color matching despite different transformation paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If sophisticated color transformation is applied to handle different source color definitions, then color management flexibility is improved, but color consistency deteriorates due to different transformation paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor management flexibilityVSAvoidcolor consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by comparing the transformed colors against expected reference values and using this information to identify and correct mismatches. The system monitors the color transformation process, detects deviations from expected results, and applies corrective adjustments to restore color consistency across different source definitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If color verification is performed only during printing, then process simplicity is maintained, but detection accuracy of color mismatches deteriorates due to late discovery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by moving color verification from the printing stage to the prepress stage. This early detection approach identifies color mismatches before they manifest in final output, significantly improving detection accuracy while the automated nature of the process maintains relative simplicity through software-based verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If remote proofing is implemented without accounting for target printer settings, then proofing accessibility is improved, but proof accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproofing accessibilityVSAvoidproof accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by customizing the proofing process to match specific target printer characteristics and settings. Rather than using a generic proofing approach, the system adapts the color transformation and verification parameters to reflect the particular printer's color behavior, ensuring that remote proofs accurately represent what will be produced on the target device while maintaining accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7612912B2Method for prepress-time color match verification and correction
Publication Date: 2009.11.03 XEROX CORP
  • US7612912B2 patent drawing
  • US7612912B2 patent drawing
  • US7612912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of identifying color mismatches for objects having different rendering intents within a print job prior to printing, includes identifying all objects within the print job, each object's type, rendering intent and all source colors associated with it; for each object in the print job, transforming each object's source colors using a prototypical color transformation; identifying sets of transformed objects having source colors that match within a first tolerance; transforming all transformed objects using a target printer's color space; identifying any of the transformed objects in each set that do not match within a second tolerance level; identifying any object types within the group of mismatched objects having at least two different rendering intents; selecting one of the rendering intents in accordance with a predetermined criterion; and assigning the selected rendering intent to at least one other instance of that object type.