Prereformer Temperature Control for Steam Hydrocarbon Reforming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in steam-hydrocarbon reforming processes is to maintain high energy efficiency while avoiding carbon deposition and overheating, especially when processing feedstocks with varying C2+ hydrocarbon concentrations, which can lead to catalyst deactivation and inefficient energy use.

Innovation Solution

The process employs a catalyst-containing reactor and a reformer furnace with a heat exchanger system that allows for on-demand cooling and indirect heat exchange, using a bypass conduit and valves to adjust reactant gas mixtures based on exothermic or endothermic reactions, ensuring optimal temperature control and steam-to-carbon ratios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If pre-reformers are operated at high temperatures to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon deposition risk, then reforming effectiveness improves, but catalyst overheating and deactivation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidreactor temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The reforming process is divided into two distinct stages: a pre-reforming stage at lower temperatures (600-800°C) to convert heavy hydrocarbons, followed by a main reforming stage at higher temperatures (800-950°C) for methane conversion. This segmentation prevents catalyst overheating during the pre-reforming stage while maintaining energy efficiency through optimized temperature zones for each reaction type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-reformer performs preliminary conversion of C2+ hydrocarbons to methane and lighter gases before the feed enters the main reformer. This preliminary action removes problematic heavy hydrocarbons that would otherwise require excessive temperatures in the main reformer, preventing catalyst damage while improving overall energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the feedstock C2+ hydrocarbon concentration varies over time, then flexibility in processing different feedstocks is achieved, but carbon deposition risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock flexibilityVSAvoidcarbon deposition
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pre-reformer operates dynamically at optimized lower temperatures (600-800°C) that are maintained regardless of feedstock composition variations. This dynamic temperature control ensures that even when C2+ hydrocarbon concentrations fluctuate, the pre-reforming conditions remain optimal for converting heavy hydrocarbons without generating excessive carbon, thereby protecting downstream catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-reformer converts the potentially harmful effect of varying C2+ hydrocarbon concentrations into a benefit by using these variations as feed for the low-temperature pre-reforming reaction. The heavy hydrocarbons, regardless of their varying amounts, are converted to lighter gases and methane in the pre-reformer, transforming what could be a carbon deposition risk into a controlled reaction that protects the main reformer catalyst.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Device complexity

If adiabatic pre-reformers are used to simplify the process, then device complexity is reduced, but temperature control precision and energy efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

An intertubular heat exchanger system acts as an intermediary between the pre-reformer and main reformer. This heat exchanger recovers thermal energy from the hot pre-reformed gas and uses it to preheat the incoming feedstock and steam, creating a thermal bridge that improves overall energy efficiency without requiring complex external heating systems or sacrificing process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If higher steam-to-carbon ratios are used to prevent carbon formation, then carbon deposition is reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon formationVSAvoidthermal energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pre-reformer performs preliminary conversion of C2+ hydrocarbons to methane and lighter gases before the feed enters the main reformer. This preliminary action reduces the overall carbon content that requires steam for gasification in the main reformer, allowing operation at lower steam-to-carbon ratios (2.0-3.5) while still preventing carbon deposition effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reforming process is segmented into pre-reforming and main reforming stages, with the pre-reformer handling heavy hydrocarbon conversion at lower temperatures. This segmentation reduces the steam demand in the main reformer since fewer heavy hydrocarbons reach that stage, thereby reducing overall thermal energy consumption while maintaining effective carbon prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances energy efficiency, prevents carbon formation, and maintains stable reactor temperatures, allowing for flexible processing of different hydrocarbon feedstocks without significant thermal energy consumption increases.

Implementation Method 1

a first heat exchanger (205) of the plurality of heat exchangers operatively configured to heat a reactant gas mixture (73) by indirect heat exchange with the combustion product gas (100)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIndirect heat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

a heat exchanger (302) operatively configured to provide on demand cooling of at least a fraction of the reactant gas mixture (73)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

During a first time period when the reactant gas mixture has a composition that reacts exothermically in the catalyst-containing reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 4

During a second time period when the reactant gas mixture has a composition that reacts endothermically in the catalyst-containing reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 5

combusting a first quantity of fuel (35, 36) with a first quantity of oxidant gas (99) in a combustion section (203) of the reformer furnace (201)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS10703629B2Method and apparatus for producing a hydrogen-containing product
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US10703629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Process and apparatus for producing a hydrogen-containing product by steam-hydrocarbon reforming of multiple hydrocarbon feedstocks in a production facility utilizing a prereformer in addition to the primary reformer. The temperature of the reactant mixture introduced into the prereformer is controlled depending on the composition of the reactant mixture fed to the prereformer.