Presentation Evaluation System Using Keyword and Related Term Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current presentation evaluation systems lack the ability to objectively assess presenters and determine efficient pages for evaluation, as they fail to accurately account for keyword and related term usage in conversations.

Innovation Solution

A presentation evaluation system that utilizes a voice analysis unit, keyword storage, related term storage, and an evaluation unit to analyze and evaluate conversations based on keyword and related term counts, combinations, and appearance orders, allowing for accurate assessment and grouping of presenters and extraction of efficient evaluation pages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If only keywords are used for evaluation, then the evaluation process is simple, but the evaluation accuracy is insufficient because related terms with substantially identical meanings are not justly evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines keywords and related terms into a unified evaluation system. The related term storage unit stores terms with substantially identical meanings to keywords, and the evaluation unit integrates both keywords and related terms to calculate evaluation values, ensuring comprehensive and accurate evaluation while maintaining system manageability through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If multiple presenters are evaluated individually, then each presenter receives detailed assessment, but the time and resources required for evaluation increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation detailVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where evaluation results are automatically calculated and provided to presenters. The system processes multiple presenters' conversations through voice analysis, calculates evaluation values based on keyword and related term usage, and provides timely feedback, enabling efficient evaluation of multiple presenters without sacrificing assessment quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If all pages of presentation material are analyzed, then comprehensive evaluation is achieved, but the complexity and time required for determining efficient pages increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidpage analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies specific pages from presentation materials that are most efficient for evaluation purposes. The system analyzes the structure and content of presentation materials, identifies key pages containing important keywords and related terms, and focuses evaluation on these extracted pages, reducing overall analysis complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11908474B2Presentation evaluation system
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 INTERACTIVE SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US11908474B2 patent drawing
  • US11908474B2 patent drawing
  • US11908474B2 patent drawing

AI summary

[Problem] Provided is a system that can objectively evaluate a person who makes a presentation (presenter) [Solution] A presentation evaluation system 1 includes: a voice analysis unit 3 that analyzes a content of a conversation, a presentation material related information storage unit 5 that stores information related to a presentation material, a keyword storage unit 7 that stores information related to a keyword in each page of the presentation material, a related term storage unit 9 that stores a related term of each keyword, and an evaluation unit 11 that evaluates the content of the conversation analyzed by the voice analysis unit 3 or a person who had the conversation. The presentation evaluation system 1 evaluates the content of the conversation or the person who had the conversation based on a count of keywords of each page of the presentation material included in the content of the conversation analyzed by the voice analysis unit 3, a count of related terms, a combination of keywords, or a combination of related terms.