Electronic Presentation Repository Search Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing and searching electronic presentation documents face challenges in scalability, usability, and customization, particularly in large storage repositories across different computing architectures and access levels, lacking effective customization and user-specific features.

Innovation Solution

Implementing storage repositories in computer servers, distributed storage networks, and cloud-based systems with search interfaces and engines that generate customized search results, track user-specific selections, and incorporate usage statistics to provide tailored search and presentation capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If document storage repositories are implemented using distributed computing and storage systems or cloud-based systems, then storage capacity and accessibility are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the document repository into multiple storage nodes distributed across different servers and locations. Each node independently stores and manages a portion of the documents, allowing the system to scale capacity by adding more nodes without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed storage system implements a unified interface layer that provides consistent document access operations across diverse storage backends. This universal interface handles different storage architectures (file systems, databases, object storage) through standardized protocols, masking the underlying complexity from users and applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If search interfaces provide comprehensive searching capabilities across large repositories, then information retrieval completeness is improved, but search processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation retrieval completenessVSAvoidsearch processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates and stores metadata indexes for documents in the repository, including text content, tags, and structural information. When a search is initiated, the interface queries these pre-computed indexes rather than scanning full documents, dramatically reducing search processing time while maintaining comprehensive retrieval capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The search interface introduces an intermediary indexing layer between the user query and the actual document repository. This intermediary processes and transforms user searches into optimized queries against pre-built indexes, and mediates between search results and the underlying distributed storage system, balancing completeness and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the system provides user-specific customization features such as personalized thumbnails and cover slide selections, then user experience is improved, but data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system stores user-specific customization data (preferred cover slides, thumbnail selections, personal settings) locally associated with each user account rather than duplicating full document copies. This allows personalized experiences to be maintained with minimal additional storage, as only reference pointers and preference metadata are stored rather than complete document replicas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11592956B2Electronic presentation repository and interface
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US11592956B2 patent drawing
  • US11592956B2 patent drawing
  • US11592956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention include techniques for storing and managing repositories of electronic presentation documents. Presentation storage repositories may be implemented in various storage systems including individual computer servers, distributed storage networks, cloud-based storage systems, and the like. Presentation search interfaces may support various searching and customization capabilities. Search interface and search engine components may be implemented to receive search requests from client devices, retrieve electronic presentation data from one or more storage repositories, and generate customized search results based on the retrieved electronic presentation data. Search and presentation capabilities may include storing user-specific selections of presentation cover slides, and then retrieving and/or generating user-specific thumbnails for search results interfaces. Additionally, presentation access and usage statistics may be tracked and stored within the storage repository and may be incorporated into the customized searching and presentation capabilities.