Press Brake Tool Interference Detection for Mis-Installed Dies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operators may improperly install additional tools in tool holders of a press brake, leading to potential damage to the part or tools during bending operations, as existing technologies lack effective detection methods for improper tool installation.

Innovation Solution

A tool improper installation detection device and method that utilizes an NC device connected to a data management server, which calculates interference regions and compares them with the attachment position of additional tools to detect overlaps, preventing improper installation by stopping the bending process if an overlap is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If operators manually attach additional tools to tool holders, then versatility and adaptability are improved, but the risk of improper installation increases leading to potential damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool holder adaptabilityVSAvoidinstallation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automatic detection feedback by using sensors to monitor tool attachment positions and comparing them against predefined correct positions. When improper installation is detected, the system provides feedback through error messages or alarms to alert operators, enabling real-time correction before damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection and mechanical checking methods with automated sensing systems. Sensors (such as optical, capacitive, or inductive sensors) automatically detect tool positions and verify proper installation, eliminating the need for operators to manually check each tool attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated detection systems are implemented, then installation reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is designed with multi-functionality to reduce overall complexity. The same sensor array and control unit that detect tool positions also verify their installation correctness, and can potentially detect other anomalies. This universal approach avoids needing separate dedicated systems for each detection function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the detection function with the existing tool holder structure and control system. Sensors are integrated into the tool holder assembly, and the detection logic is combined with the press brake's existing control unit, eliminating the need for separate standalone detection devices and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4029620B1Press brake die mis-installation detecting device, and die mis-installation detecting method
Publication Date: 2024.05.29 AMADA CO LTD
  • EP4029620B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4029620B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4029620B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An NC device (40) obtains, when a plurality of bending lines set for a part are sequentially bent using a predetermined tool, an interference region in which the part interferes with the tool when a tool length of the tool used for each bending line is virtually extended. The NC device (40) detects whether or not the interference region interferes with an additional tool additionally attached to a tool holder, and determines that the additional tool is an improperly installed tool when it is detected that the interference region interferes with the additional tool.