Press Crosshead Truss Structure for Lower Weight and Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crossheads for open-die and drop-forging presses are heavy and cumbersome, posing challenges in manufacturing, handling, and transportation due to their solid design, and they do not allow for optimal mechanical properties or accessibility to press components.

Innovation Solution

A crosshead with a truss support structure that connects the upper and lower chords via side stands, allowing for weight reduction while maintaining mechanical parameters, and optionally enhancing mechanical properties, along with a design that eliminates the need for cylindrical sleeves and improves force dissipation through transverse tension ribs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a solid and massive construction is used for the crosshead, then the mechanical strength and rigidity are improved, but the weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The crosshead is segmented into a truss support structure consisting of multiple individual struts connected at nodes, replacing the solid massive construction. This segmentation allows material to be placed only where structurally necessary, reducing weight while maintaining strength through the distributed triangular framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crosshead employs a composite structure combining the truss support structure with the upper and lower chords. This composite design integrates the lightweight truss framework with the load-bearing chords to achieve optimal strength-to-weight ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If a solid and massive construction is used for the crosshead, then the rigidity is improved, but the weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid truss support structure is segmented into multiple struts arranged in triangular patterns, where each strut contributes to the overall rigidity. The segmented design maintains structural stability through the geometric rigidity of triangles while using less material than a solid construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The truss support structure utilizes three-dimensional spatial arrangement of struts to achieve rigidity. By distributing structural elements in multiple dimensions and orientations, the design achieves rigidity without requiring excessive material in any single dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Force

If a solid and massive construction is used for the crosshead, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the handling and transportation become extremely complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidhandling and transportation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The crosshead is segmented into modular components including the truss support structure with individual struts and nodes, as well as separate upper and lower chords. This modularity reduces total weight and allows for more manageable handling and transportation compared to a monolithic solid construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a solid and massive construction is used for the crosshead, then the structural integrity is improved, but the manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The crosshead is manufactured as a segmented truss structure with discrete struts and nodes that can be fabricated separately and assembled. This segmentation reduces material costs, simplifies manufacturing processes, and lowers overall production expenses while maintaining structural integrity through the engineered truss design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4153413B1Crosshead for use as an upper and/or lower beam in a press
Publication Date: 2024.07.10 SMS GROUP GMBH
  • EP4153413B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4153413B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4153413B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a crosshead (1) for use as an upper and/or lower beam (50, 60) in a press (100), in particular an open-die forging press or a closed-die forging press, comprising an upper flange (2) and a lower flange (5) connected to the upper flange (2) via a first and a second lateral upright (3, 4), the first lateral upright (3) being located in the region of a first distal end (6) and the second lateral upright (4) being located in the region of a second distal end (7) of the crosshead (1). The crosshead (1) is characterised in that, between the two lateral uprights (3, 4), it has a framework support structure (8) via which the upper flange (2) and the lower flange (5) are additionally connected to one another.