Press Quality Sampling Using Material and Production Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring component quality in motor vehicle production using presses are inefficient due to time-consuming and costly measurements, and the difficulty in integrating quality control into the production process, leading to incomplete data collection and suboptimal process control.

Innovation Solution

A method that selects samples based on material and production parameters using an electronic computing device, employing sensors and machine learning algorithms to detect component properties and deviations from target values, enabling automated quality control and process optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of all components is performed, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but productivity and cost increase due to time-consuming and costly measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent quality detectionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing measurements on only a selected subset of components rather than all components. The selection is based on material properties and production parameters that indicate higher risk of quality deviations, thereby achieving adequate quality monitoring while reducing measurement time and costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of measurement frequency from continuous (all components) to selective (based on material and production parameters). By using material properties and production parameters as selection criteria, the system achieves efficient quality monitoring without requiring continuous measurement of every component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If selective sampling is performed, then productivity is improved by reducing measurement time, but measurement precision may deteriorate due to incomplete data collection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent quality detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using detected component properties and quality deviations to adjust and optimize the selection criteria for future measurements. The system learns from detected deviations and refines which material properties and production parameters are most indicative of quality issues, improving measurement precision over time while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces random or manual sampling with an automated electronic selection system that uses material properties and production parameters. This substitution of the sampling mechanism with an intelligent selection algorithm ensures that the most relevant components are measured, maintaining measurement precision while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive data collection is implemented, then reliability of quality control is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and computing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data collection system into modular components: material property sensors, production parameter sensors, component property detectors, and an electronic selection device. Each module performs a specific function, and the segmented architecture improves reliability through specialized detection while managing complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If automated selection and detection is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to electronic computing devices and algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control automationVSAvoidelectronic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the electronic computing device to automatically select components for measurement based on material properties and production parameters without manual intervention. The system autonomously determines which components require quality detection, improving ease of operation while the automated nature manages the complexity internally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240351300A1Method for Operating a Press, Computer Program and Electronically Readable Data Carrier
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US20240351300A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a press, wherein a relationship between a detected component property (current value) of the final product (e.g. surface quality), the provided material property of the semi-finished product (e.g. sheet thickness), and the detected production parameter (e.g. pressing pressure) is determined, for example, by a self-learning algorithm, on the basis of precedingly determined differential values between target and current values of the component property. The algorithm is subsequently used for targeted selection of samples for quality monitoring.