Pressing Machine Crankshaft Synchronization via Linkage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressing machines with crankshaft-driven mechanisms face difficulties in smoothly transmitting rotary motion due to dead centers, leading to poor start/stop performance, press forming accuracy, and increased cycle times, and are burdened by complex structures and high costs due to the use of gear members with large moments of inertia.

Innovation Solution

A pressing machine design featuring co-axially disposed crankshafts with eccentric shafts, connecting rods, and levers that transmit rotary motion without gear members, ensuring synchronization and eliminating dead centers through the cooperative actions of first and second connection levers, thereby improving start/stop performance and press forming accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If gear members are used to transmit rotary driving force among crankshafts, then the structure is robust and reliable, but the moment of inertia becomes extremely large, resulting in poor start/stop performance and low operating response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of rotary force transmissionVSAvoidstart/stop performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes gear members from the rotary force transmission mechanism, extracting the harmful large moment of inertia while maintaining the essential function of synchronous rotation among crankshafts through alternative linkage mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic linkage mechanisms (connecting rods and levers) that allow for smoother acceleration and deceleration of crankshafts, enabling better start/stop performance compared to rigid gear connections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple gears and links are used to transmit driving force, then the structure can accommodate complex motion requirements, but the device complexity increases significantly with many components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion transmission capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple transmission functions into integrated linkage structures where connecting rods and levers simultaneously perform force transmission, motion conversion, and synchronization functions, reducing the total component count

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The linkage components are designed to perform multiple functions: connecting rods transmit force and enable motion conversion, while levers provide both structural support and motion control, eliminating the need for dedicated single-function components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If yokes are used to transmit rotary motion among crankshafts, then the structure is simplified, but dead centers are created where the direction of rotation becomes instantaneously unfixed, preventing smooth transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission mechanism structureVSAvoidsmoothness of rotary motion transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic levers with controlled degrees of freedom that maintain continuous rotational direction control, eliminating the instantaneous unfixed state that occurs at dead centers in yoke mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary linkage components (connecting rods and levers) that mediate the force transmission between crankshafts, preventing the direct linear force transmission through yokes that causes dead center problems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables smooth rotary force transmission among crankshafts, enhancing start/stop performance, reducing cycle times, and simplifying the machine structure to lower production costs while maintaining high press forming accuracy and concentricity.

Implementation Method 1

each of which has two co-axially disposed main shaft portions and an eccentric shaft portion disposed between and eccentrically with respect to the two main shaft portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEccentric mechanism: Eccentric

Implementation Method 2

the eccentric shaft portions and the pins have a phase difference of 90° therebetween during the rotary motions of the crankshafts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase difference:

Data Source

PatentEP3045302B8Pressing machine
Publication Date: 2017.08.16 YAMADA DOBBY

AI summary

A pressing machine having a structure improved to smoothly transmit a rotary driving force among a plurality of crankshafts, and so as to have improved start/stop performance and improved press forming accuracy, and so as to permit reduction of a cycle time required for forming the desired product. In the pressing machine having a plurality of crankshafts (34) each having main shaft portions (30) and an eccentric shaft portion (32), at least one first connection lever (48) is attached to the eccentric shaft portions (32) of the plurality of crankshafts for rotating the plurality of crankshafts in synchronization with each other, and a second connection lever (56) is attached to pins (54) which are formed integrally with the respective crankshafts, and positions of which as seen in a circumferential direction of the main shaft portions are different from those of the eccentric shaft portions.