Pressure-Assisted Blotting Membrane Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting biological entities on blotting membranes are time-consuming and require large volumes of reagents, often taking several hours to complete and involving cumbersome equipment.

Innovation Solution

A pressure-assisted method using either vacuum or positive pressure to efficiently pass reagents and wash solutions through blotting membranes, reducing the detection process to 30-45 minutes with minimal liquid volume, employing a device with a porous support and flow distributor to facilitate even liquid distribution and removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual washing and incubation methods are used, then detection accuracy is maintained, but processing time is excessive (3-6 hours to overnight) and reagent volume is large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies vacuum pressure to accelerate liquid flow through the membrane during washing and incubation steps. The vacuum manifold creates negative pressure that draws reagents and wash buffers through the membrane rapidly, reducing processing time from hours to minutes while maintaining detection accuracy through controlled fluid dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static incubation methods to dynamic vacuum-assisted flow. The vacuum pressure dynamically controls the rate of liquid passage through the membrane, allowing optimization of both speed and binding efficiency. The flow rate can be adjusted by vacuum level to balance rapid processing with adequate reaction time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If traditional washing methods are used, then background noise is reduced, but large volumes of reagents are consumed and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidreagent volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Vacuum-assisted washing delivers precise control over liquid flow through the membrane. The vacuum pressure ensures complete penetration of wash buffers while removing excess liquid efficiently. This reduces reagent volume requirements while maintaining thorough washing that preserves signal-to-noise ratio through controlled fluid dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical parameter of liquid flow rate through vacuum application. By controlling vacuum pressure, the system optimizes the balance between washing efficiency (for low background noise) and reagent consumption. The vacuum allows rapid exchange of wash buffers with smaller volumes compared to traditional methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If vacuum or positive pressure is applied to accelerate reagent delivery, then processing time is reduced to 30-45 minutes, but control over liquid flow becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidflow control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum manifold system provides centralized control over liquid flow through the membrane. By adjusting vacuum pressure levels, operators can control the rate of reagent delivery and wash buffer flow. The system translates vacuum pressure into controlled flow rates, making speed control intuitive through pressure regulation rather than complex flow metering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum pressure acts as an intermediary between the operator and the liquid flow. Instead of directly controlling flow rate, the operator controls vacuum pressure, which then mediates the flow rate through the membrane. This indirect control simplifies operation while maintaining precise flow management for accelerated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If extensive washing is performed to remove contaminants and unbound antibodies, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing time increases to 3-6 hours or overnight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidwashing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Vacuum-assisted washing accelerates the removal of contaminants and unbound antibodies by creating pressure differential that drives rapid buffer exchange. The vacuum pulls wash buffers through the membrane quickly, achieving thorough washing in minutes rather than hours while maintaining detection accuracy through adequate contaminant removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system rushes through the washing steps by applying vacuum pressure to accelerate liquid flow. Multiple wash buffers can be quickly exchanged through the membrane under vacuum, completing extensive washing requirements in a fraction of the traditional time. The rapid flow ensures thorough removal of contaminants without the prolonged incubation times of conventional methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces the time and reagent volume required for detection, improving efficiency and reducing background noise, while maintaining blot quality.

Implementation Method 1

The use of a vacuum or positive pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

The use of a vacuum or positive pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

Some researchers have suggested the use of the capillary action of an absorbent material such as filter paper placed below the membrane to draw the remaining fluids through the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS8557600B2Immunoassay product and process
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 EMD MILLIPORE CORP
  • US8557600B2 patent drawing
  • US8557600B2 patent drawing
  • US8557600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rapid, efficient and convenient method to detect one or more biological entities on a blotting membrane is provided. The detection can relate to the position, nature or amount of the biological substance on one or more membranes. The invention method involves a pressure assisted regiment (such as vacuum or positive gas pressure) for the supply and removal of reagents and permits washing of the contaminants from substances embedded in the membrane to be detected using very low volumes of liquid. This method enables completion of the blocking, washing and antibody binding steps in about 30 minutes without comprising blot quality. In another aspect, the invention is directed to an apparatus useful in conducting the method of the invention. The device is comprised of several layers including a porous support layer below the blotting membrane(s), a flow distributor above the blotting membrane(s) and a well on the flow distributor to contain the liquid to the desired area and to allow for lower starting volumes of such liquid. Preferably, the flow distributor is a non-binding or low binding hydrophilic porous membrane such as a 0.22 micron membrane.