Pressure-Based Chemical Etching for Conical Nanopores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating conical nanopores in high-density nanoporous membranes are inefficient, requiring expensive equipment and posing safety risks due to the need for large voltages and currents, which are not suitable for large-scale applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pressure-biased chemical etching using a basic and acidic solution to create conical nanopores, where the differential pressure regulates the flow of solutions through the membrane, allowing for the production of asymmetric etching and control over nanopore morphology without the need for high voltages or plasma etching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If voltage-based electrochemical etching is used to create conical nanopores, then nanopore shape control is achieved, but equipment cost and operational safety deteriorate due to requiring expensive vacuum equipment and high voltages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanopore shapeVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the voltage-based electrochemical etching system with a pressure-based chemical etching system. Instead of applying high voltages (up to 30 V) across electrodes to create conical nanopores, the invention uses differential pressure (up to 30 psi) to drive chemical etchants through the membrane, achieving the same conical pore morphology without expensive vacuum equipment or high-voltage power supplies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs hydraulic pressure to control the etching process. A pressure differential is applied across the membrane to regulate the flow of basic and acidic solutions through the nanopores, enabling precise control over etching rate and nanopore shape without requiring complex electrical equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Shape

If high voltage is applied to create conical nanopores in high-density membranes, then asymmetric etching is achieved, but safety and operational feasibility deteriorate due to hazardous hydrogen and oxygen gas production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasymmetric etchingVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for high-voltage electrical systems by substituting them with a pressure-driven chemical etching system. This replacement removes the source of hazardous hydrogen and oxygen gas production while maintaining the ability to create asymmetric conical nanopores through controlled differential pressure application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the previously harmful high-voltage electrical energy into a safer pressure-driven chemical process. By using pressure to drive the etching reaction instead of electricity, the system eliminates dangerous gas evolution while maintaining effective nanopore shaping capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Shape

If voltage-based etching is used for high-density nanopores, then conical shape is achieved, but energy consumption and operational cost increase due to large currents required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconical nanoporeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces energy-intensive voltage-based etching with a pressure-based system that consumes significantly less energy. The pressure differential required (up to 30 psi) is mechanically achievable and maintains etching effectiveness without the high current demands (greater than 1.5 V) of electrical etching methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the safe and cost-effective creation of conical nanopores with tunable size and aspect ratio, facilitating advanced technologies in ionic transport and filtration processes while avoiding hazardous conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The basic solution etches the membrane, while the acidic solution neutralizes any etchant that diffuses through the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

the acidic solution neutralizes any etchant that diffuses through the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutralization reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

applying a differential pressure across the membrane, thereby regulating the flow of the first or second solution through the nanopores

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-driven flow: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 4

If the pores are sufficiently small, the electrochemical double layer formed on the interior surfaces of these pores can be manipulated so as to control the transport of charged species through the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical double layer: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS9387444B2Method to fabricate functionalized conical nanopores
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US9387444B2 patent drawing
  • US9387444B2 patent drawing
  • US9387444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure-based chemical etch method is used to shape polymer nanopores into cones. By varying the pressure, the pore tip diameter can be controlled, while the pore base diameter is largely unaffected. The method provides an easy, low-cost approach for conically etching high density nanopores.