Pressure Exchange Chamber Layout for Moonpool Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressure exchange chamber systems for hydraulic ore hoisting systems face challenges in being deployed through a moonpool while maintaining sufficient length and avoiding blockages due to bends or height differences, which are exacerbated in deep sea environments.

Innovation Solution

The design of pressure exchange chambers with a generally central centre of gravity, horizontally stacked pipes, and balanced valve arrangements minimizes tilting and reduces blockages, allowing deployment through a moonpool and efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the pressure exchange chamber system is made long (over 60m, sometimes over 100m or 150m long) to work effectively in HOHS, then the system effectiveness is improved, but the difficulty of deployment through a moonpool increases due to size constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem effectivenessVSAvoiddeployment through moonpool
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure exchange chamber system is divided into multiple individual pressure exchange chambers (PECs) that can be connected in series. Each PEC is a manageable unit that can be deployed through the moonpool individually, while the overall system achieves the required length by connecting multiple PECs together, thus resolving the contradiction between system length and deployability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure exchange chambers are arranged in a three-dimensional configuration rather than a simple linear extension. By stacking PECs vertically and connecting them through manifold systems, the system achieves the required functional length while maintaining a compact footprint that fits through the moonpool dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If multiple bends are introduced in the pressure exchange chamber to accommodate deployment constraints, then the deployability is improved, but the degradation of polymetallic nodules being transported in the slurry increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedeployabilityVSAvoiddegradation of polymetallic nodules
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure exchange chambers are designed with smooth, curved transitions rather than sharp bends. The circular cross-section of the PECs and the gradual curvature of connections minimize turbulence and mechanical stress on the polymetallic nodules during transport, reducing degradation while still allowing the chamber to be deployed in constrained spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Adaptability or versatility

If height differences or gradients are introduced in the pressure exchange chamber, then the adaptability to deployment positions is improved, but the risk of blockages in the chamber increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to deployment positionsVSAvoidrisk of blockages
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure exchange chambers are designed to operate with minimal height differences between the water input end and slurry output end, creating an equipotential flow path. This reduces gravitational effects that could cause blockages while still allowing deployment flexibility through the modular PEC configuration and flexible positioning of the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Ease of operation

If the pressure exchange chamber system is made compact to fit through the moonpool, then the deployability is improved, but the achievable chamber length decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployability through moonpoolVSAvoidchamber length
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure exchange chambers are designed with nested or stacked configurations where smaller PECs can be positioned within or alongside larger ones during deployment. The modular design allows PECs to be compacted into a smaller volume for moonpool passage, then extended into the required operational length once deployed on the sea bed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a two-dimensional planar arrangement to a three-dimensional stacked configuration. Multiple PECs are arranged vertically and connected through manifold systems, achieving the required functional chamber length while maintaining a compact horizontal footprint that fits through the moonpool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4565795B1Pressure exchange chamber
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 WEIR MINERALS NETHERLANDS BV
  • EP4565795B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4565795B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4565795B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A pressure exchange chamber comprises: a pressure exchange chamber pipe (12) extending around a perimeter; a driving fluid input valve (44) and a driving fluid output valve (46), both valves being enclosed by the pressure exchange chamber pipe; and a slurry input valve (34) and a slurry output valve (36), both valves being enclosed by the pressure exchange chamber pipe. A hydraulic ore hoisting system (HOHS) for use at sea comprising a plurality of such pressure exchange chambers is also disclosed.