Pressure Connector Assembly for Tamper-Responsive Secure Enclosures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing secure electronic communication systems are vulnerable to tampering, as encryption/decryption systems on electronic assemblies can be targeted for decryption keys or fraudulent encoding, necessitating enhanced tamper-proof mechanisms to protect sensitive components.

Innovation Solution

A tamper-respondent assembly is implemented, comprising an enclosure with a tamper-detect sensor covering its inner surface, a monitor circuit to detect tampering, and pressure connector assemblies with a spring-biasing mechanism to break electrical connections upon tampering, ensuring secure volume protection for encryption/decryption modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the enclosure is sealed and components are encapsulated to prevent tampering, then security is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly is divided into distinct functional components: the enclosure forming a secure volume, the tamper-respondent sensor as a separate layer, the monitor circuit as an independent module, and the pressure connector assembly as a discrete component. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured and tested separately, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tamper-respondent sensor is positioned within the secure volume formed by the enclosure, with the monitor circuit nested inside the same volume. The pressure connector assembly is disposed within the secure volume between the sensor and circuit board. This nested arrangement consolidates multiple security functions within a compact structure, reducing manufacturing steps while enhancing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If the tamper-respondent sensor covers the inner surface of the enclosure to detect tampering, then detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tamper-respondent sensor serves multiple functions: it detects tampering attempts through its tamper-detect circuit, provides structural support as part of the enclosure assembly, and enables the spring-biasing mechanism to function. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining high detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The tamper-respondent sensor is integrated with the enclosure structure, where the sensor layer is positioned to cover the inner surface and work in conjunction with the enclosure walls. The monitor circuit is combined with the sensor to form an integrated monitoring system. This merging reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the spring-biasing mechanism is used to break electrical connections upon tampering, then response effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-biasing mechanism is pre-configured in a biased state during manufacturing, with the spring already under tension or compression. The conductive pressure connector is pre-positioned to make electrical contact with the tamper-respondent sensor. When tampering occurs, the pre-biased spring immediately pushes the connector away, breaking the electrical connection without requiring additional control circuits or power sources, thus maintaining low device complexity while ensuring reliable response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-biasing mechanism is a self-actuating system that automatically responds to tampering attempts without requiring external control. The spring's mechanical energy stored during assembly provides the force to break the electrical connection when the enclosure is compromised. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for complex control logic, microcontrollers, or additional power management circuits, reducing device complexity while maintaining high response effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tamper-respondent assembly effectively detects and responds to tampering attempts by automatically erasing critical data, providing a high-security environment that meets Security Level 4 standards, significantly enhancing the protection of sensitive components within secure volumes.

Implementation Method 1

a spring-biasing mechanism to facilitate breaking electrical connection of the conductive pressure connector to the at least one tamper-detect circuit with a tamper event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11765816B2Tamper-respondent assemblies with pressure connector assemblies
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11765816B2 patent drawing
  • US11765816B2 patent drawing
  • US11765816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Tamper-respondent assemblies are provided which include an enclosure mounted to a circuit board and enclosing one or more components to be protected within a secure volume. A tamper-respondent sensor covers, at least in part, an inner surface of the enclosure, and includes at least one tamper-detect circuit. A monitor circuit is disposed within the secure volume to monitor the tamper-detect circuit(s) for a tamper event. A pressure connector assembly is also disposed within the secure volume, between the tamper-respondent sensor and the circuit board. The pressure connector assembly includes a conductive pressure connector electrically connecting, at least in part, the monitor circuit and the tamper-detect circuit(s) of the tamper-respondent assembly, and a spring-biasing mechanism to facilitate breaking electrical connection of the conductive pressure connector to the tamper-detect circuit(s) with a tamper event.