Pressure Cooker Locking Mechanism With Disengageable Safety Coupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressure cooking appliances face issues with user safety due to the risk of untimely and excessive force being applied to the locking mechanism, leading to potential breakage and sudden release of steam, despite design enhancements like oversized parts and metallic materials, which complicate design and increase costs.

Innovation Solution

A compact and reliable engagement/disengagement mechanism using a movable connector that uncouples driving and receiving parts along parallel planes, allowing the control member to move without unlocking the lid when the safety means is active, reducing the need for excessive force and eliminating the risk of part breakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the locking mechanism uses a kinematic chain with leverage multiplication to facilitate user operation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the risk of excessive force breaking parts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of locking and unlockingVSAvoidrisk of part breakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A disengageable connection element is introduced as an intermediary between the control mechanism and the locking jaws. This element can be disengaged by the safety rod when pressure is high, breaking the force transmission path and preventing excessive force from reaching the locking mechanism parts, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection between the control mechanism and locking jaws is made dynamic rather than fixed. The disengageable connection element can switch between engaged and disengaged states based on safety conditions, allowing the system to adapt its force transmission characteristics to prevent breakage while maintaining ease of operation when safe

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If oversized components and metallic materials are used to prevent breakage, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to breakageVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety function is extracted from the locking mechanism structure itself and implemented as a separate disengageable connection element controlled by the safety rod. This allows the locking mechanism to use simple, lightweight materials while the safety feature provides the necessary protection against breakage, avoiding the need for oversized components throughout the entire mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state parameter of the connection element (engaged/disengaged) based on pressure conditions rather than changing the physical dimensions or material properties of the locking mechanism components. This allows reliable protection against breakage while maintaining simple design and low manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the safety rod mechanically locks the control mechanism in the locked position, then the safety is improved, but the user can still inadvertently apply excessive force attempting to unlock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety preventionVSAvoidrisk of excessive force application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The disengageable connection element acts as an intermediary that breaks the force transmission path when the safety rod is in the locked position. This prevents the user's excessive force from being transmitted to the locking jaws, while still allowing the control mechanism to move freely without risking mechanical failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3184008B1Pressure-cooking device with improved safety
Publication Date: 2019.03.06 SEB SA
  • EP3184008B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3184008B1 patent drawingFigure 4~7
  • EP3184008B1 patent drawingFigure 8~10

AI summary

- Improved safety pressure cooker. - Pressure cooking appliance comprising: - a tank and a lid, - a safety means capable of occupying an active position, - a movable locking and unlocking control member, - an engagement/disengagement means, characterized in that the engagement/disengagement means comprises at least one driving part (10) movable along a first trajectory inscribed in a first plane and a receiving part (11) movable along a second trajectory inscribed in a second plane, said planes being parallel and located one above the other, said engagement/disengagement means comprising a movable connector (12, 13) capable of moving in a secant direction to said first trajectory. - Pressure cookers.