Pressure-Driven 3D Printing for Satellite Components in Vacuum

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 3D printing technologies are inefficient in outer space due to slow heat dissipation and difficulties with extruding photopolymers in microgravity, leading to challenges in manufacturing spacecraft components directly in space.

Innovation Solution

A 3D printing apparatus utilizing a pressure differential to extrude printing material, combined with a temperature control module for viscosity regulation, allowing operation in low-vacuum environments without the need for complex mechanical systems or additives, and using noble gases for stable printing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional 3D printing uses thermoplastic filaments that are melted and deposited layer-by-layer, then complex 3D objects can be created, but the printing process cannot operate effectively in outer space due to slow heat dissipation via infrared radiation in vacuum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D printing capabilityVSAvoidheat dissipation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal-based extrusion with pressure-driven extrusion. Instead of melting and cooling thermoplastic filaments through thermal cycles, the invention uses pressurized gas to force printing material through a nozzle, eliminating the need for active cooling systems and thermal management in vacuum environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental operating parameters of 3D printing from temperature-controlled thermal processes to pressure-controlled mechanical extrusion. By using pressurized gas (such as nitrogen or argon) to drive material through the nozzle, the system operates independently of thermal dissipation rates, making it suitable for vacuum conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If photopolymers are used for 3D printing in outer space, then printing can potentially work in vacuum, but the photopolymers clump together in microgravity and require thickening agents that make them difficult to handle and cause wear to the printing mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting capability in vacuumVSAvoidhandling difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs pneumatic extrusion where pressurized gas flows through a seal to force printing material out of a nozzle. This pneumatic system eliminates the need for mechanical pumps and moving parts that would wear in the printing mechanism, while also avoiding the need for thickening agents by using gas pressure directly on the material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces pressurized gas as an intermediary between the power source and the printing material. The gas acts as a mediator that transmits force to extrude the material without requiring direct mechanical contact or complex pumping systems, thereby reducing wear and improving handleability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If thickening agents are added to photopolymers to increase viscosity for extrusion, then the photopolymers become printable, but the thickened photopolymers are difficult to pump and require resupply missions which would be very difficult in outer space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion capabilityVSAvoidresupply difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a self-contained system where pressurized gas stored in tanks provides the extrusion force directly, eliminating the need for mechanical pumps. This self-service approach allows the system to operate autonomously in space without requiring complex resupply mechanisms, as the pressurized gas can be stored and used as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If conventional 3D printers use motors to generate extrusion force, then printing can be controlled, but the motors require power that would be limited in outer space and increase device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion controlVSAvoidmotor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces motor-driven mechanical extrusion systems with a passive pressure-driven system. Instead of using motors to push material through the nozzle, the invention uses stored pressurized gas to provide the extrusion force, eliminating motors and their associated power requirements while maintaining control through pressure regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable and efficient 3D printing in space by minimizing contamination risks, reducing maintenance needs, and achieving precise material deposition for complex geometries, while conserving energy and ensuring structural integrity of printed objects.

Implementation Method 1

When the 3D printing apparatus is exposed to an external environment having a pressure P2 being less than the pressure P1 of the gas in the first chamber, the gas in the first chamber exerts a force on the seal which in turn exerts a force on the printing material thereby extruding the printing material out of the second chamber through the nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a seal arranged movably inside the housing such that the seal partitions the housing into first and second chambers that are fluidically isolated from each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid isolation: Semipermeable Membrane

Data Source

PatentUS20240109243A13D printing apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.04.04 ORBITAL MATTER POLAND SP ZOO
  • US20240109243A1 patent drawing
  • US20240109243A1 patent drawing
  • US20240109243A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In general terms the present invention proposes a 3D printing apparatus 100 for printing a satellite component. The 3D printing apparatus comprises a housing 102, a seal 104 arranged movably inside the housing such that the seal partitions the housing into first and second chambers 106A, 106B that are fluidically isolated from each other, and a nozzle 108 in fluid connection with the second chamber 106B. The first chamber 106A comprises a gas having a pressure P1 and the second chamber 106B comprises a printing material. When the 3D printing apparatus 100 is exposed to an external environment having a pressure P2 being less than the pressure P1 of the gas in the first chamber 106A, the gas in the first chamber 106A exerts a force on the seal 104 which in turn exerts a force on the printing material thereby extruding the printing material out of the second chamber 106B through the nozzle 108 to print the satellite component.