Pressure-Driven Valve for Glaucoma Drainage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current glaucoma treatments using passive drainage devices often lead to bleb formation and fibrosis, which increase flow resistance and reduce the effectiveness of IOP control, as they lack smart, interactive control over fluid flow and are prone to under-filtration and over-filtration issues.

Innovation Solution

An implantable IOP control system featuring a pressure-driven valve system and an electrically-driven pump system that adjusts flow rates based on pressure differentials between the anterior chamber, drainage site, and atmospheric pressure, preventing bleb formation and fibrotic changes by dynamically controlling aqueous humor flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If passive drainage devices are used to lower IOP, then intraocular pressure is reduced, but flow resistance increases over time due to fibrosis and bleb formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintraocular pressureVSAvoidflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a pressure-driven valve that dynamically adjusts flow resistance based on pressure differentials. The valve responds to changes in IOP and bleb pressure, automatically modulating drainage flow to maintain optimal conditions. This dynamic adjustment prevents the fixed flow rate limitations of passive devices, adapting to fibrotic changes over time without requiring manual intervention or increasing flow resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a feedback mechanism where the pressure-driven valve continuously monitors pressure differentials between the anterior chamber and bleb site. Based on this feedback, the valve adjusts its opening degree to regulate flow. This closed-loop control prevents over-filtration that would increase bleb pressure and subsequent fibrosis, thereby maintaining reliable drainage function over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If drainage flow rate is increased to improve IOP control, then IOP management is enhanced, but bleb pressure increases leading to fibrosis and migration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage flow rateVSAvoidbleb pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure-driven valve uses feedback from pressure differential measurements to automatically regulate drainage flow rate. When bleb pressure rises, the reduced pressure differential causes the valve to close partially, limiting further flow and preventing excessive bleb pressurization. This self-regulating mechanism prevents the harmful effects of over-filtration while maintaining effective IOP control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow rate parameter dynamically based on operating conditions. The pressure-driven valve adjusts its flow characteristics in response to pressure differentials, transitioning between open and closed states as needed. This parameter modulation allows the system to maintain high flow rates when needed for IOP control while automatically reducing flow when bleb pressure becomes excessive, preventing fibrosis and migration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If drainage flow is limited to prevent over-filtration, then bleb pressure is controlled, but under-filtration occurs reducing IOP control effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebleb pressure controlVSAvoidIOP control effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure-driven valve provides dynamic flow control, transitioning between open and closed states based on real-time pressure differential conditions. When IOP is elevated and the pressure differential favors drainage, the valve opens to maximize flow and maintain IOP control effectiveness. When bleb pressure rises and reverses the pressure differential, the valve closes to prevent over-filtration. This dynamic behavior eliminates the need to choose between under-filtration and over-filtration limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the drainage flow parameter in response to pressure differential changes. The valve's opening degree is continuously adjusted based on the balance between IOP and bleb pressure, allowing maximum flow when safe and minimal flow when bleb pressure is high. This parameter adaptation ensures both effective IOP control and prevention of over-filtration complications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If pressure-driven valve system is implemented to dynamically control flow, then IOP control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIOP control precisionVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure-driven valve is a self-regulating device that requires no external power source, control electronics, or active components. It automatically responds to pressure differentials through its mechanical design, opening when IOP exceeds bleb pressure and closing when the reverse occurs. This passive operation achieves precise IOP control without adding electronic complexity, power requirements, or control system burden to the implantable device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages intraocular pressure by preventing under-filtration and over-filtration, reducing bleb formation and fibrosis, thereby maintaining optimal IOP control and minimizing complications such as hypotony and bleb-related issues.

Implementation Method 1

The valve system may include a first pressure-driven valve and a second valve, wherein the pressure-driven valve system is configured to control flow rates of the aqueous humor along the drainage tube by shifting in response to pressure differentials between the anterior chamber of the eye, the drainage site, and the atmospheric pressure acting on the pressure-driven valves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8579848B2Active drainage systems with pressure-driven valves and electronically-driven pump
Publication Date: 2013.11.12 ALCON INC
  • US8579848B2 patent drawing
  • US8579848B2 patent drawing
  • US8579848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An IOP control system for implantation in an eye of a patient is disclosed. The IOP control system includes a drainage tube configured to convey aqueous humor from an anterior chamber of an eye and includes a pressure-driven valve system in fluid communication with the drainage tube and configured to control flow rates of the aqueous humor. The valve system includes a plurality of pressure-driven valves arranged to operate in cooperation with each other. The IOP control system may include an electronic pump system to further regulate flow.