Rotary Pressure Exchanger Rotor Layout for Low Mixing and Vibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rotary pressure exchangers in reverse osmosis systems face issues of increased energy consumption due to mixing losses between brine and fresh seawater, leading to salt concentration increases and mechanical unbalance causing vibrations, while seeking a compact design with high flow rate per size.

Innovation Solution

A rotary pressure exchanger with a rotor design featuring back-to-back pressure exchanger units, symmetrically aligned channels, and radial fluid ports, along with hydrostatic support and balanced separators, to minimize mixing and vibrations, and enhance flow efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a freely slidable physical plug is provided as a separator in each channel to reduce mixing of brine and fresh seawater, then mixing losses are significantly reduced, but mechanical unbalance is generated causing considerable vibrations of the rotor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing lossesVSAvoidvibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces counterbalancing weights positioned opposite to the physical plugs in the rotor channels. These counterweights compensate for the mechanical unbalance caused by the asymmetric positioning of the plugs, thereby reducing vibrations while maintaining the energy-saving benefit of reduced mixing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric channel design where channels are positioned at different angular orientations. This asymmetric arrangement, combined with strategically placed physical plugs and counterweights, optimizes the balance between preventing fluid mixing and minimizing rotor vibrations through controlled asymmetry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Power

If the rotor is designed with straight axially oriented ducts for pressure transfer by positive displacement, then energy transfer efficiency is improved, but device size increases reducing flow rate per size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from purely axial duct orientation to include radially oriented fluid ports and channels. This dimensional change allows pressure transfer to occur in multiple directions (axial and radial), maintaining energy transfer efficiency while reducing the axial length and overall device volume, thereby increasing flow rate per size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curved or radially oriented channel paths instead of straight axial ducts. This curvature allows the fluid to follow a more compact circular path within the rotor, reducing the overall device dimensions while maintaining effective pressure transfer through the rotating mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Productivity

If radial fluid ports are used instead of axial ports, then compact design with higher flow rate per size is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate per sizeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the rotor into multiple segments or sections with radial ports distributed around the circumference. This segmentation allows each port to be manufactured independently using standardized processes, reducing overall manufacturing complexity despite the compact radial design. The modular approach facilitates easier assembly and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a compact size with high flow rate, reduced energy consumption, and minimized vibrations, improving the efficiency and performance of the reverse osmosis system.

Implementation Method 1

the energy transfer takes place by a positive displacement of the fluids following Pascal's principle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPascal's principle: Pascal's Law

Implementation Method 2

During operation of the device the narrow gap between the rotor and the sleeve provides a hydrodynamic support of the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic support: Lubrication

Implementation Method 3

a freely slidable physical plug can be provided as a separator in each channel for reducing a mixing of the first fluid (brine) and the second fluid (fresh seawater)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical separation: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS12442392B2Rotary pressure exchanger
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 SULZER MANAGEMENT AG
  • US12442392B2 patent drawing
  • US12442392B2 patent drawing
  • US12442392B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotary pressure exchanger includes a housing and a rotor mounted within the housing for rotation about an axis of rotation defining an axial direction. The rotor extends from a first rotor end in the axial direction to a second rotor end, a plurality of channels is inside the rotor for transferring pressure from the first fluid to the second fluid, and each channel extends parallel to the axis of rotation. The plurality of channels includes a set of first channels and a set of second channels, and the rotor includes a divider arranged between the first rotor end and the second rotor end for separating the first channels from the second channels, Each first channel extends from the first rotor end in the axial direction to the divider, and each second channel extends from the second rotor end in the axial direction to the divider.