Pressure Manipulation for Material Breakdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing waste treatment methods require chemical reagents, result in less than optimal fragmentation, and fail to break down plastics, with potential for high costs and inefficient energy use due to single-cycle pressurization and decompression processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving introducing materials into a treatment vessel, increasing pressure above atmospheric levels, and subsequent depressurization, repeated to achieve partial breakdown without chemical reagents, using pressure manipulation alone to disrupt material structures and potentially enhance chemical breakdown.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If chemical reagents are used to treat waste material, then the material can be softened for removal, but the cost increases due to chemical expenses and additional wet treatment steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial softeningVSAvoidchemical cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the chemical reagent treatment step from the waste processing method. Instead of using chemicals to soften material, the process directly applies mechanical fragmentation through impact and compression forces, removing the need for chemical softening agents and their associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical-mechanical system (chemical softening followed by mechanical removal) with a purely mechanical system. High-energy impact and compression forces directly fragment the waste material without requiring chemical pretreatment, substituting chemical action with mechanical action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If a single cycle of pressurization and decompression is used, then the process is simpler, but the fragmentation is less than optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess cyclesVSAvoidfragmentation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies periodic action by implementing multiple cycles of pressurization and decompression. Each cycle subjects the waste material to repeated high-energy impact and compression, progressively increasing fragmentation quality. The periodic repetition of stress cycles accumulates mechanical work on the material, achieving superior size reduction compared to a single cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Strength

If conventional pressurization methods are used, then plastics remain intact, but the method fails to achieve comprehensive waste breakdown

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplastic integrityVSAvoidwaste breakdown efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameters of pressurization by applying extremely high compression forces followed by rapid decompression. This parameter change creates shock waves and intense mechanical stress that exceed the strength limits of plastic materials, causing them to fragment. The modified pressurization parameters (higher peak pressure, faster rate of change) enable breakdown of previously resistant materials like plastics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If rapid decompression is applied to fragment material, then size reduction is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize reductionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by performing progressive fragmentation across multiple cycles. Each cycle achieves partial size reduction, progressively breaking down the material into smaller pieces. This preliminary action in early cycles reduces the energy required in subsequent cycles, as smaller material pieces require less energy to fragment further, optimizing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables controlled, efficient breakdown of materials without adverse effects on carriers, achieving size reduction and decomposition with reduced energy consumption and costs, effectively fragmenting a wide range of materials including plastics.

Implementation Method 1

increasing pressure on the material or product item or combination of material or product items in said treatment vessel to above atmospheric pressure; subsequently depressurising the material or product item or combination of material or product items in treatment vessel to achieve a pressure reduction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure manipulation: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 2

decompressing the vessel to achieve a pressure reduction of at least 0.5 bar in at most 5 seconds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlash decompression: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 3

The theory posited in this document is that the discrete waste product items are fragmented by the steam and flash decompression due to one or more of melting, hydrolysis and thermal decompression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decompression: Thermolysis

Implementation Method 4

The theory posited in this document is that the discrete waste product items are fragmented by the steam and flash decompression due to one or more of melting, hydrolysis and thermal decompression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 5

The sudden release of the pressure in the vessel causes the moisture to change to steam and a certain portion of the liquid in the material to flash to vapor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 6

a certain portion of the liquid in the material to flash to vapor in accordance with thermodynamic laws. The resulting rapid expansion within the processed material fragments it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid expansion: Flash Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS20230146791A1A method of at least partially breaking down a material or product item or a combination of materials or product items
Publication Date: 2023.05.11 RDC TECH LTD
  • US20230146791A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of at least partially breaking down a material or product item or combination of material or product items. The method includes the steps of introducing said material or product item or combination of material or product items into a treatment vessel, introducing at least one working fluid into the treatment vessel, repeatedly increasing pressure on the material or product item or combination of material or product items in said treatment vessel to above atmospheric pressure and then subsequently depressurising the material or product item or combination of material or product items in the treatment vessel to achieve a pressure reduction in the vessel to effect at least partial breakdown of said material or product item or combination of material or product items.