Pressure Sensor Service Life Testing via Dynamic Pressure-Time Curves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing service life testing methods for pressure sensors are limited by constant applied pressure or temperature, failing to simulate real-world environments, which hinders accurate determination of sensor service life.

Innovation Solution

A service life testing device utilizing pneumatic tendon drivers to control relative movement between temperature control jigs, simulating actual working environments by replicating pressure-time curves, allowing for synchronized pressure and temperature data collection to determine sensor accuracy and service life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If constant pressure or temperature testing is used, then the testing device structure is simple, but the service life determination accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice life determination accuracyVSAvoidtesting device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing static constant pressure/temperature testing with dynamic cyclic pressure-time curve simulation. The testing device dynamically adjusts pressure and temperature parameters according to predefined service environment cycles, enabling the sensor to experience real-world varying conditions. This dynamic testing approach significantly improves service life determination accuracy while maintaining reasonable device complexity through programmable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying both pressure and temperature parameters according to service environment characteristics. The testing device modifies pressure-time curves and temperature profiles to match actual application conditions, allowing comprehensive evaluation of sensor performance under diverse environmental parameters. This multi-parameter variation strategy enhances measurement precision for service life assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If real-world environment simulation is implemented, then service life determination accuracy improves, but test time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice life determination accuracyVSAvoidtest time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by implementing cyclic pressure-time curve testing that repeats service environment cycles. The testing device periodically varies pressure and temperature according to predefined patterns, allowing acceleration of degradation processes. This periodic testing approach enables faster observation of sensor failure modes while maintaining accuracy, reducing overall test time compared to continuous static testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by maintaining uninterrupted cyclic testing that continuously applies varying pressure and temperature conditions. The testing device keeps the sensor under constant service environment simulation without idle periods, ensuring every test minute contributes to service life assessment. This continuous dynamic testing optimizes the balance between test accuracy and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If pressure-time curve simulation is added, then testing accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by incorporating sensors to monitor actual pressure and temperature conditions during testing. The control system uses feedback signals from pressure sensors and temperature sensors to adjust the pressure-time curve simulation in real-time, ensuring accurate replication of service environments. This feedback mechanism enhances testing accuracy while managing control system complexity through closed-loop regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing a multi-functional testing device that can simulate various service environments through programmable pressure-time curves and temperature profiles. The same basic testing platform can accommodate different application scenarios (e.g., deep sea, high altitude, industrial processes) by loading different test parameters, eliminating the need for multiple specialized devices and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces test time and costs by accurately simulating real-world conditions, enabling precise service life determination and performance verification of pressure/temperature sensors, thus saving material and labor costs.

Implementation Method 1

a compression spring disposed along an axial direction of each of the slide rails

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11506559B2Service life testing device for pressure sensor and testing method using same
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 METAL INDS RES & DEV CENT
  • US11506559B2 patent drawing
  • US11506559B2 patent drawing
  • US11506559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A service life testing device for a pressure sensor includes a first and a second plates, the first plate including a stage carrying a to-be-tested pressure sensor; a pair of drivers, two ends thereof respectively connected to the first and the second plates; a pair of linear slide mechanisms, disposed between the first and the second plates, and each including a slide rail and a slider moving there along, where a compression spring is disposed along an axial direction of each slide rail; a jig, disposed between the first and the second plates, and facing the to-be-tested pressure sensor; and a processing unit, electrically connected to the drivers and the to-be-tested pressure sensor, and configured to control a moving direction, a moving speed, and a moving stroke of the drivers, to cause the to-be-tested pressure sensor to press against or move away from a surface of the jig.