Pressure Sensor Testing via Controlled Vapor Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pressure sensors in e-cigarettes may fail to accurately detect inhalation pressure due to clogging, leading to inadequate vaporization and user experience issues, as existing testing methods lack standardized protocols to verify sensor performance before and after product failure.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a microcontroller, test fixture, and display that introduces known fluid or vapor pressures to the pressure sensor, allowing for real-time monitoring and validation of sensor performance, including inhalation and exhalation simulations to determine if the sensor is functioning correctly and unclogged.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pressure sensors are used in e-cigarettes to detect inhalation pressure, then vaporization control is improved, but sensor clogging occurs leading to detection failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor performanceVSAvoidclogging
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary testing of the pressure sensor before actual product use by exposing it to controlled vapor pressures and flow conditions. This preliminary validation ensures the sensor is functioning correctly and unclogged before deployment, preventing detection failures during actual use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the pressure sensor output and compares it against expected ranges. When the sensor reading deviates from the expected range, the system provides feedback indicating potential clogging or performance degradation, allowing for timely intervention or replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If existing testing methods are used without standardized protocols, then testing flexibility is maintained, but sensor performance verification becomes unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor validation accuracyVSAvoidtesting system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system validates the pressure sensor by exposing it to multiple known fluid or vapor pressures and observing the sensor's response. By changing the pressure parameters systematically and comparing sensor output against expected values, the system achieves reliable sensor verification without requiring overly complex testing apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If pressure sensors operate without performance validation, then device simplicity is maintained, but product failure detection capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detectionVSAvoidtesting system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure sensor system performs self-validation by comparing its own output readings against known input pressures. The sensor essentially tests itself by responding to controlled pressure inputs, eliminating the need for separate complex validation systems while maintaining reliable failure detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system effectively validates pressure sensor performance, ensuring accurate detection of inhalation and exhalation pressures, preventing clogging issues and maintaining proper vaporization, thereby enhancing user experience and product reliability.

Implementation Method 1

A pressure sensor is used within the e-cigarette to sense when a user is inhaling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

a vaporizing chamber with a heating coil attached for the aerosol precursor material to become vaporized therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

The heating coil material typically includes a nickel/chromium wire, a titanium wire, nichrome wire, or similar alloy wires

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 4

The aerosol precursor material is either adsorbed or resting on the electronic smoking article's heating apparatus and heated until it becomes vapor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS10859459B2System and method for pressure sensor testing and verification
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
  • US10859459B2 patent drawing
  • US10859459B2 patent drawing
  • US10859459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for testing and validating the performance of a pressure sensor includes a test fixture operatively connected to the pressure sensor, and the pressure sensor is configured to identify a fluid pressure relative to an atmospheric pressure. A microcontroller is in electrical communication with the test fixture and the pressure sensor, and the microcontroller is configured to cause the test fixture to introduce air and/or vapor through the pressure sensor at a known fluid pressure. The microcontroller is also configured to receive the identified fluid pressure from the pressure sensor, the identified fluid pressure being based on the air and/or vapor flowing through the pressure sensor. A power source is in electrical communication with the microcontroller, and a display is in electrical communication with the microcontroller. The display is configured to display results to a user, the results comprising the determination of the performance of the pressure sensor.