Pressure Switching Valve Geometry for Low-Hysteresis Snap Action

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pressure-activated valves often exhibit high hysteresis due to frictional and flow forces, leading to undesirable leakage, process cycling, and control variances, which is undesirable for precise fluid control.

Innovation Solution

A pressure actuated switching valve design featuring a valve chamber with staggered inner diameters and a spring-biased valve member, allowing for 'snap-action' transitions between open and closed positions with minimal intermediate dwell time, reducing hysteresis by evenly distributing pressure across different areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If pressure activated valve uses traditional ball valve design, then valve can be passively controlled, but hysteresis increases due to frictional forces, flow forces, and pressure application time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassive controlVSAvoidhysteresis
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The valve member is divided into multiple sections (first section, second section, third section) with different diameters positioned at different locations within the valve chamber. Each section experiences different pressure forces, creating a balanced force system that reduces hysteresis while maintaining passive control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the valve member have different diameters (first outer diameter, second outer diameter, third outer diameter) to create localized variations in pressure application. This allows specific regions to experience different forces, optimizing the overall force balance to minimize hysteresis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If pressure activated valve uses traditional design, then structure is simple, but control response is slow leading to valve leakage and process cycling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structureVSAvoidcontrol response
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The valve member is segmented into multiple sections with different diameters, allowing different parts to respond to pressure at different rates. This segmentation enables a more rapid and balanced response to pressure changes, reducing control variances and preventing leakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The valve member geometry is changed by varying the diameters of different sections. This parameter variation optimizes the pressure distribution and force balance, enabling faster response times and reducing the dwell time in intermediate positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If pressure is applied to move valve ball off seat, then valve opens, but frictional forces and flow forces create high hysteresis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve actuationVSAvoidhysteresis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different sections of the valve member have different diameters to create localized quality variations. This allows specific sections to experience different pressure forces, balancing the forces acting on the valve member and minimizing frictional and flow forces that cause hysteresis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The diameters of different valve member sections are changed to optimize the force balance. By adjusting the first, second, and third outer diameters, the pressure distribution is optimized to reduce hysteresis while maintaining ease of actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves low hysteresis, minimizing leakage and control variances, and enhancing response times by ensuring the valve transitions rapidly and consistently between positions.

Implementation Method 1

a spring arranged in the fifth chamber portion, the spring engaging the third section of the valve member, wherein the spring biases the valve member toward the sealing surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

A pressure actuated switching valve design featuring a valve chamber with staggered inner diameters and a spring-biased valve member, allowing for 'snap-action' transitions between open and closed positions with minimal intermediate dwell time, reducing hysteresis by evenly distributing pressure across different areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11906063B2Pressure actuated switching valve
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US11906063B2 patent drawing
  • US11906063B2 patent drawing
  • US11906063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure actuated switching valve includes a first valve chamber including a first chamber portion. The first chamber portion has a first inner diameter, a second chamber portion having a second inner diameter that is greater than the first inner diameter, a third chamber portion having a third inner diameter that is greater than the first inner diameter, a fourth chamber portion having a fourth inner diameter that is greater than first inner diameter, and a valve member. The valve member includes a first section having a first outer diameter that is greater than the first inner diameter. A second section of the valve member has a second outer diameter that is closely matched to the third inner diameter. A third section of the valve member is arranged has a third outer diameter that is greater than the first outer diameter.