Pre-strained Composite Test Coupons for Accurate Strength Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing test methods for composite laminate materials often undervalue material capabilities and provide inconsistent results, especially under varying test conditions, and may not accurately determine ultimate strength and modulus due to issues like adhesive tab degradation and inconsistent bonding processes.

Innovation Solution

A composite test coupon with a cross-ply layup design, featuring first and second ply layers with fibers oriented in different directions, is pre-strained by applying a threshold tensile load below the failure load, inducing stress cracks in the matrix material of the second ply layers, allowing for accurate determination of strength and modulus without adhesive tabs, even under harsh environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If adhesive tabs are used to secure test coupons, then the testing process is simplified, but adhesive degradation occurs under harsh environmental conditions leading to inaccurate results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting processVSAvoidtest result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes adhesive tabs from the testing system entirely. Instead of using adhesives to secure the coupon, the test apparatus directly grips the coupon edges through mechanical means, eliminating the adhesive degradation problem while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a specialized test apparatus with gripping mechanisms as an intermediary between the operator and the coupon. This apparatus provides secure holding without requiring adhesive tabs, thereby eliminating the harmful adhesive-material interaction under harsh environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If standard test methods are used, then testing is straightforward, but material capability is undervalued and results are inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting simplicityVSAvoidstrength and modulus determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a preliminary action by pre-straining the composite coupon to a specific strain level (e.g., 0.2% or 0.4%) before the actual strength testing. This preliminary straining step prepares the material in a controlled manner that reveals its true mechanical properties, eliminating the need for complex adhesive bonding procedures while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the testing parameters by implementing a two-stage loading process: first applying a predetermined strain level, then continuing to apply load to determine failure. This parameter change approach allows accurate determination of ultimate strength and modulus while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If adhesive tabs are used for bonding, then the bonding process is simplified, but bonding consistency varies under different test conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding processVSAvoidbond strength consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent completely removes the adhesive bonding process from the system. The test apparatus directly secures the coupon edges mechanically, eliminating variable bonding conditions and ensuring consistent test results across different manufacturing and testing environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The coupon itself serves its own securing function through its geometric design and the test apparatus's gripping mechanisms. The coupon's own structure provides the necessary attachment points, eliminating the need for external adhesive bonding agents that introduce variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables more accurate and consistent testing of composite materials by reducing the need for adhesive tabs, improving the accuracy of strength and modulus calculations, and allowing testing across a range of conditions without adhesive degradation, thus enhancing the characterization of composite materials at the ply level.

Implementation Method 1

The pre-stressed matrix material includes stress induced cracks between the second fibers of each of the second ply layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress cracking: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentEP3101408B1Pre-strained composite test coupons
Publication Date: 2021.12.29 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3101408B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3101408B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3101408B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A composite test coupon (200) includes a plurality of plies. The plurality of plies include first ply layers (208) and second ply layers (210). The first ply layers (208) have first fibers and a substantially uniform matrix material associated with the first fibers. The second ply layers (210) have second fibers and a pre-stressed matrix material associated with the second fibers. The first fibers are oriented in a first direction, and the second fibers are oriented in a second direction that is different from the first direction. The pre-stressed matrix material includes stress induced cracks between the second fibers of each of the second ply layers (210).