Prevalence-Volume Ratio Matrix for Document Relevance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods, such as Latent Semantic Indexing and TF-IDF, are inadequate for segmenting a corpus of documents to provide insights into term relevance within specific segments, limiting their ability to identify the most relevant terms or job titles associated with a particular category.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that ingest a corpus of documents, segment them based on a search operator, calculate prevalence-volume values, and generate a prevalence-volume ratio (PVR) matrix to associate tokens with relevance scores, enabling the identification of relevant terms and job titles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If TF-IDF techniques are applied to determine document relevance, then the relevance scoring between documents is improved, but the ability to segment the corpus and provide segment-based insights is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance scoring precisionVSAvoidcorpus segmentation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the corpus into distinct segments based on document categories or topics. The system creates segment-specific term frequency matrices and calculates TF-IDF scores separately for each segment, enabling both precise relevance scoring within segments and the ability to analyze different corpus portions independently. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining TF-IDF precision while adding segmentation versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the corpus is segmented to provide segment-based insights, then the ability to identify relevant terms within specific categories is improved, but the overall document relevance scoring capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegment-based analysis capabilityVSAvoiddocument relevance scoring precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-functionality by creating a system that can perform both segment-specific analysis and overall document relevance scoring. The architecture computes TF-IDF matrices at multiple levels: segment-level matrices for category-specific insights and corpus-level matrices for overall relevance. This allows the system to provide both specialized segment analysis and comprehensive document scoring, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If term frequency-weighted relevance is used to identify unique terms, then the relevance between documents with unique terms is improved, but the ability to identify segment-specific relevant terms is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterm relevance precisionVSAvoidsegment-specific term identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a segment dimension to the traditional TF-IDF approach. Instead of computing a single term frequency matrix for the entire corpus, the system creates multiple dimensioned matrices organized by segments or categories. Each segment has its own TF-IDF calculations, adding a categorical dimension that enables both unique term identification and segment-specific term analysis simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between term relevance precision and segment-specific identification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11928433B2Systems and methods for term prevalence-volume based relevance
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 KERR RICHARD
  • US11928433B2 patent drawing
  • US11928433B2 patent drawing
  • US11928433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for prevalence-volume based relevance are provided. Corresponding systems and methods may include ingesting a corpus of documents; receiving a search operator; segmenting the corpus of documents into (i) a first set of documents that matches the search operator, and (ii) a second set of documents that do not match the search operator; extracting a first and second token list of tokens; calculating a prevalence-volume value for tokens included in the first and second token lists; generating a prevalence-volume ratio (PVR) matrix that associates tokens included in the first and/or second token lists with a PVR value, wherein the PVR value for a particular token is a ratio between the prevalence-volume value of the particular token for the first set of documents and the prevalence-volume value of the particular token for the second set of documents; and associating the search operator with the generated PVR matrix.