Machine Learning Price Bands for Relative Expensiveness and User Affinity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to understand the subjective expensiveness of items and user affinities across different item categories, making it difficult to personalize recommendations and improve conversion rates on electronic platforms.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning architecture that includes a price band determination model and an affinity prediction model to assign items to price bands based on relative expensiveness and analyze user interactions, generating personalized price affinity predictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If absolute price values are used to determine item expensiveness, then the system can process pricing data simply, but it fails to capture the subjective expensiveness relative to item categories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of expensiveness determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of pricing analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the pricing analysis from using absolute price values to using relative price ratios. By calculating the ratio between an item's price and the average price of its category, the system captures subjective expensiveness while maintaining computational efficiency. This parameter transformation resolves the contradiction by improving measurement precision without significantly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces category average prices as an intermediary reference point. Instead of directly comparing absolute prices, the system uses the category average as a mediator to determine relative expensiveness. This intermediary approach enables the system to capture nuanced pricing perceptions while keeping the analysis framework manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If the system analyzes user interactions with items across different categories, then it can understand user price preferences, but it becomes difficult to configure the system to learn what constitutes expensive or inexpensive items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding of user price preferencesVSAvoidcomplexity of system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the analytical parameter from absolute price thresholds to relative price ratios. By using ratios of item price to category average price, the system can generalize user preferences across categories without requiring category-specific configuration. This parameter transformation enables the system to learn user price affinities while maintaining a unified, simple configuration approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal pricing analysis framework that works across all item categories using the same price ratio methodology. Instead of configuring separate rules for different categories, the system applies a universal approach of comparing item prices to their respective category averages, enabling the system to handle diverse categories with a single configuration scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the system provides personalized recommendations based on price affinity, then user satisfaction improves, but the system requires sophisticated machine learning architectures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of recommendationsVSAvoidcomplexity of machine learning architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the recommendation problem by using price ratios as the key feature instead of absolute prices. This parameter transformation simplifies the learning task for the machine learning model, as users' price preferences can be captured through their interactions with items of varying price levels within their preferred ratio ranges, reducing the complexity of the architecture needed to achieve accurate recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates price ratios for all items and stores them as features before the recommendation process. By performing this preprocessing action in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during real-time recommendation generation, enabling sophisticated personalization with a more manageable architecture that leverages pre-computed features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12354147B2Systems and methods for determining price bands and user price affinity predictions using machine learning architectures and techniques
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US12354147B2 patent drawing
  • US12354147B2 patent drawing
  • US12354147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system comprising one or more processors and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computing instructions that, when executed on the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: evaluating, using a price band determination model, degrees of expensiveness of items relative to each other in item type categories; generating, using the price band determination model, price bands associated with item type categories; assigning each of the items to a respective one of the price bands associated with a respective one of the item type categories; and presenting, to one or more end-user applications, at least one other item corresponding to at least one of the price bands associated with at least one of the item type categories. Other embodiments are disclosed.