Prime Mover Transient Testing With Feedforward Dynamometer Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Transient testing of prime movers is lengthy, costly, and lacks repeatability, often requiring different types of dynamometers for various tests, which increases time and expense, and existing methods struggle to accurately simulate real-world driving conditions.
Innovation Solution
A method using a power absorbing dynamometer with a closed-loop control system incorporating both feedforward and feedback loops to control prime movers, allowing precise control of load and rotational speed, enabling transient testing without motoring, and applicable to both electric motors and internal combustion engines.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If a full vehicle chassis dynamometer is used for transient testing, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a virtual model of the vehicle drivetrain system that replicates the behavior and characteristics of the actual vehicle-chassis-dynamometer setup. This software-based copy allows transient testing to be performed on a simpler power-absorbing dynamometer while achieving the measurement precision of a full vehicle chassis dynamometer through computational modeling of the drivetrain dynamics.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with a control system that uses software-based drivetrain modeling. Instead of requiring a mechanically complex vehicle chassis dynamometer, the system uses a power-absorbing dynamometer controlled through advanced algorithms that simulate the mechanical behavior of the full vehicle system, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement accuracy.
2Measurement precision
If different types of dynamometers are used for steady state and transient testing, then testing accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases due to commissioning and setup
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the power-absorbing dynamometer universal by enabling it to perform both steady-state and transient testing functions through software control. The same dynamometer hardware can be configured for different test types without requiring physical reconfiguration or commissioning, as the control system adapts the testing parameters and models according to the desired test type, thereby eliminating setup time while maintaining accuracy.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces dynamic adaptability to the dynamometer system through software-based control that can switch between steady-state and transient testing modes. The control system dynamically adjusts the testing parameters, feedback loops, and drivetrain models based on the selected test type, allowing the same hardware to efficiently handle multiple test scenarios without time-consuming reconfiguration.
3Ease of operation
If iterative modification of throttle input is used to achieve target throttle, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a feedback control mechanism that continuously monitors the actual throttle position and compares it to the target throttle position. The control system automatically calculates the error and adjusts the throttle input accordingly, eliminating the need for manual iterative modification. This automated feedback loop maintains ease of operation by allowing the user to simply specify the target throttle while the system handles the precise adjustment, thereby reducing the time required to achieve the desired throttle position.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary calculations of the required throttle input using a drivetrain model before actual testing begins. The control system pre-determines the optimal throttle trajectory to reach the target position, avoiding the need for iterative adjustments during the test setup phase. This preliminary action reduces the time required while maintaining ease of operation, as the system has already optimized the throttle path before the user needs to intervene.
4Measurement precision
If expensive transient dynamometers are used for transient testing, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a virtual drivetrain system that copies the dynamic behavior of expensive transient testing setups. By modeling the drivetrain dynamics, gear ratios, and vehicle characteristics in software, the system allows a simpler power-absorbing dynamometer to achieve the measurement precision of expensive transient dynamometers through computational simulation rather than expensive hardware.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent substitutes complex mechanical transient dynamometer systems with a software-based control approach on a simpler power-absorbing dynamometer. Instead of relying on expensive mechanical systems with complex feedback mechanisms, the patent uses computational models and control algorithms to achieve the same measurement precision, thereby reducing device complexity and cost while maintaining transient testing accuracy.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of transient testing a prime mover wherein the prime mover is coupled to a power absorbing dynamometer. The method comprising the steps of: receiving a first load setpoint and a first rotational speed setpoint, wherein the first load setpoint and the first rotational speed setpoint correspond to a first time point in a prime mover testing profile, wherein the prime mover testing profile is a model of a real-world testing profile; outputting the first load setpoint or the first rotational speed setpoint to the power absorbing dynamometer; determining a first baseline prime mover demand input using a first feedforward loop; determining a first prime mover demand input, wherein the first prime mover demand input is based on the first baseline prime mover demand input and the first load setpoint or the first rotational speed setpoint; outputting the first prime mover demand input to the prime mover; wherein, upon the first load setpoint being provided to the power absorbing dynamometer, the first prime mover demand input is based on the first baseline prime mover demand input and the first rotational speed setpoint, and wherein, upon the first rotational speed setpoint being provided to the power absorbing dynamometer, the first prime mover demand input is based on the first baseline prime mover demand input and the first load setpoint; receiving a first load measurement value and a first rotational speed measurement value; and determining a second prime mover demand input based on: the first prime mover demand input or a second baseline prime mover demand input; a second load setpoint or a second rotational speed setpoint; and the first load measurement value or the first rotational speed measurement value.


