Print Coverage Guidance UI for Subscription Image Forming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users in subscription contracts for image forming apparatuses face difficulty in determining how to adjust their image formation to avoid exceeding the coverage rate threshold, leading to additional fees, as existing systems do not provide clear guidance on how to manage printing material usage effectively.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that derive the use amount of printing material per sheet and generate a UI screen displaying the number of sheets that can be printed within the contract's upper limit, helping users manage their usage to stay within the coverage rate threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the system provides only basic coverage rate information, then the system complexity is low, but the user cannot effectively manage printing material usage to avoid exceeding thresholds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser ability to manage printing material usageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments coverage rate management information into multiple dimensions: current coverage rate, projected coverage rate, threshold values, and actionable recommendations. This segmentation allows users to understand and manage their printing material usage more effectively without overwhelming system complexity, as each segmented information element addresses a specific user need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of projected coverage rates and potential threshold violations before users actually exceed thresholds. By providing advance warnings and guidance on how many additional images can be printed, the system enables users to take preliminary actions to stay within contract limits, improving ease of operation while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated forecasting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If the system provides detailed guidance on coverage rate management, then user ability to control usage improves, but the information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completeness for user decision makingVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor current coverage rates, compare them against contract thresholds, and provide actionable recommendations. The feedback loop includes: (1) tracking current usage, (2) projecting future rates based on remaining contract period, (3) comparing with threshold values, and (4) providing guidance information. This structured feedback approach ensures complete information for user decision-making while managing processing complexity through systematic comparison and projection algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters from abstract coverage rate concepts to concrete, actionable metrics: it calculates the number of additional images that can be printed, determines remaining contract period, and computes projected coverage rates. These parameter transformations convert complex coverage rate management into simple, understandable guidance, reducing information processing complexity while maintaining information completeness for user decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system calculates projected coverage rates and provides actionable guidance, then user satisfaction improves, but the computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem ability to provide personalized guidanceVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on calculating only the essential parameters needed for user guidance: current coverage rate, projected coverage rate, and number of additional printable images. Rather than computing all possible metrics, the system performs only the necessary calculations to provide actionable guidance, reducing computational energy consumption while maintaining adaptability through personalized recommendations based on individual user contract terms and usage patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260023513A1Information processing apparatus, control method of information processing apparatus, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 CANON KK
  • US20260023513A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023513A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023513A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus obtains information indicating the number of sheets on which the image forming apparatus performed image formation in a predetermined period and a use amount of a printing material required for the image formation, derives a use amount of the printing material per a predetermined number of sheets based on the obtained information, and causes a terminal used by the user to output a UI screen generated based on the derived use amount of the printing material per the predetermined number of sheets and an upper limit of the use amount of the printing material per the predetermined number of sheets in a contract in the subscription service. The UI screen displays the number of sheets on which image formation can be performed and the use amount of the printing material per the predetermined number of sheets.