Print Apparatus Edge Pixel Processing for Image Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing print apparatuses using multi-level dither methods often produce jagged edges in images due to inadequate separation of edge and non-edge pixels, leading to suboptimal image quality and increased hardware or software load.

Innovation Solution

A print apparatus that includes an edge detector, screen processor, pulse width converter, and output unit to differentiate and process edge and non-edge pixels separately, using attribute information to determine pulse width data for accurate image formation without increasing load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If edge detection is performed using color information, then edge pixels and non-edge pixels can be separated accurately, but processing load increases and buffer size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary attribute information from the input image data to identify edge pixels, rather than performing complete color analysis. This selective extraction reduces processing load while maintaining sufficient accuracy for edge detection, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing is segmented into two distinct paths: edge pixels undergo filtering processing while non-edge pixels undergo screen processing. This segmentation allows each pixel type to be handled with the appropriate level of processing, reducing overall computational load while maintaining edge detection accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multi-level dither method is used for screen processing, then processing efficiency is maintained, but jagged edges and broken fine lines occur at low density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing methods to different regions of the image based on edge detection results. Edge pixels receive filtering processing to prevent jagged edges, while non-edge pixels receive screen processing to maintain processing efficiency. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying complex filtering to all pixels, the patent applies filtering only partially to edge pixels where it is most needed. This partial action maintains processing efficiency while improving image quality at critical edge portions, resolving the contradiction between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8755087B2Print apparatus which performs screen processing based on input gradation data
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8755087B2 patent drawing
  • US8755087B2 patent drawing
  • US8755087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A print apparatus includes an edge detector using attribute information, a screen processor which binarizes each pixel included in image data with a screen processing, a pulse width converter which converts each pixel included in the image data to pulse width data in accordance with an input gradation value, and an output unit which outputs pulse width data from either of the screen processor or the pulse width converter for each pixel. The output unit outputs the pulse width data from the pulse width converter for an edge pixel and outputs the pulse width data from the screen processor for a non-edge pixel.