Print Head Alignment via Test Matrix Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-impact printing processes, particularly inkjet printing, face challenges in maintaining register and aligning print heads accurately due to errors in nozzle functionality and alignment, making it difficult to detect and correct issues such as misalignment and varying responses to control signals.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a printing press that generates a test print image using non-impact print heads, which is recorded by a sensor device, allowing for position checking and color density testing to determine the relative position of print heads and adjust settings, clean nozzles, or modify control signals as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If non-impact printing processes are used to produce different print images, then printing flexibility and adaptability are improved, but register accuracy and alignment precision deteriorate due to nozzle functionality errors and misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting flexibilityVSAvoidregister accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by generating test print images before actual production printing. These test images contain position check elements and color density test elements that allow the system to detect and correct nozzle alignment issues and register errors before they affect production output. The test printing process is performed in advance to identify and compensate for potential misalignment problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensor devices to detect the position of printed test images and comparing this information against expected values. The system calculates deviations in position and color density, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust print head positions, modify control signals, and clean nozzles, thereby maintaining register accuracy despite the flexibility of non-impact printing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If all dot-producing devices are checked by producing dots next to each other, then functional testing is simplified, but error allocation to individual nozzles becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting simplicityVSAvoiderror allocation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the test print image into distinct functional areas: position check elements for alignment testing and color density test elements for nozzle functionality testing. Each element type serves a specific diagnostic purpose, allowing the system to separately evaluate and allocate errors to individual nozzles or alignment issues rather than treating all defects uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating different types of test elements with specific characteristics tailored to their diagnostic purposes. Position check elements have specific geometric features for alignment measurement, while color density test elements have patterns designed to reveal nozzle performance variations. This localized testing approach makes error detection and allocation more precise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If test print images are generated and evaluated to check position and color density, then print quality control is improved, but printing process interruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint quality controlVSAvoidprocess interruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing quality control testing before production printing begins. The test print images are generated in advance to establish baseline measurements of position accuracy and color density, allowing the system to identify and correct issues before actual production starts. This prevents interruptions during the main printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuity of useful action by integrating test printing into the overall printing process flow in a way that minimizes disruption. The system can perform rapid test printing during setup or maintenance periods, and use automated evaluation to quickly identify and correct issues, maintaining continuous productive operation rather than requiring separate dedicated testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3817925B1Method for operating a printing press with a test printed image, and a printed product having a test printed image
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 KOENIG & BAUER AG
  • EP3817925B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3817925B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3817925B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating printing press (01), wherein a test printed image (566) is produced on a substrate (02) by means of a print head (416; 616; 816) which has a multiplicity of dot-generating devices (583) which are arranged in the form of a generator matrix (578) consisting of generator rows (579) and generator columns (581), which test printed image (566) has a function testing region (564), for the production of which a multiplicity of function test elements (572) which are arranged in the form of a test matrix (574) consisting of test rows (576) and test columns (577) are generated by means of the dot-generating devices (583), and wherein the test rows (576) are arranged such that they are oriented parallel to a transverse direction (A), and wherein it is true for a plurality of function test elements (572) within the test matrix (574) that function test elements (572) which are closest neighbours in pairs in relation to the transverse direction (A) are not closest neighbours in relation to absolute spacings within the test matrix (574); and to a printed product.