Print Job Complexity Scoring for Automated Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In print shops, managing and routing print jobs efficiently is challenging due to varying complexities, as existing automated processing modules are limited and often fail with complex jobs, leading to manual intervention and idle printers.

Innovation Solution

A customized algorithm that calculates a complexity score for each print job based on assigned weight factors, allowing for automatic routing to the appropriate printers, enhancing existing automated processing modules to handle jobs of different complexities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated processing modules are used to route print jobs, then processing efficiency is improved for simple jobs, but the system fails to handle complex jobs requiring manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidjob routing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of job complexity assessment by introducing a scoring mechanism that evaluates multiple job characteristics (finishing operations, page count, paper types, binding requirements) to generate a complexity score. This quantitative parameter transformation enables the automated system to distinguish between simple and complex jobs, routing appropriate jobs to automated processors while flagging complex jobs for manual review, thus resolving the contradiction between processing efficiency and routing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual review of each print job is performed, then job routing accuracy is improved, but processing time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob routing accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial automation by performing automated complexity assessment and routing for jobs that meet certain criteria, while reserving manual review only for jobs exceeding complexity thresholds. This partial action approach maintains high routing accuracy for the majority of jobs through automated analysis of job parameters, while minimizing the time and labor required for manual intervention, thus resolving the contradiction between routing accuracy and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If printers are assigned based on simple queue management, then system simplicity is maintained, but printer utilization efficiency decreases due to idle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidprinter utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of print job complexity and characteristics before routing jobs to printers. By pre-calculating complexity scores and pre-identifying suitable printers based on job requirements and printer capabilities, the system enables efficient job distribution that minimizes printer idle time. This preliminary action maintains relative system simplicity while significantly improving printer utilization efficiency through intelligent, proactive job assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9600213B1Customized print job analysis to identify job complexity
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 KONICA MINOLTA SYSTEMS LABORATORY INC
  • US9600213B1 patent drawing
  • US9600213B1 patent drawing
  • US9600213B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a print solution that provides efficient managing, routing and processing of print jobs in a print shop. Particularly, the print solution applies a customized algorithm that analyzes the job complexity of all print jobs and based on the job complexity analysis, routes print jobs to the correct printers for printing.