Print Job Grouping Controller for Shared Imaging Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In shared image recording environments, users often face issues where their jobs are not executable immediately due to changes in recording media or device settings made by other users, leading to unnecessary operations and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

An image recording apparatus with a controller that groups jobs based on device status information, generating priority group conditions to ensure that jobs are executed with matching media and settings, allowing users to select and perform batch printing without immediate operational disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple image recording jobs are accumulated and grouped by common conditions for batch execution, then image recording efficiency is improved, but the system cannot adapt when device settings or recording media change between job submission and execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage recording efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to device status changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary grouping of image recording jobs based on common conditions (recording media type, number of copies, post-process conditions) before execution. This allows jobs to be organized in advance for efficient batch processing while maintaining the ability to detect and respond to status changes before execution begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users when grouped jobs are detected to have incompatible conditions with current device status (e.g., different recording media type). This feedback mechanism allows users to review and adjust job grouping or device settings before execution, ensuring adaptability while maintaining batch processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If jobs are executed in accumulated order without grouping, then device status changes are automatically adapted to, but image recording efficiency decreases due to inability to batch process compatible jobs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic adaptation to status changesVSAvoidimage recording efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of executing jobs in simple accumulated order, the system performs preliminary analysis and grouping of jobs based on their conditions. This allows compatible jobs to be identified and batched together in advance, improving efficiency while still allowing for status change detection before execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback information to users about job grouping results and any incompatibilities with current device status. This enables users to make informed decisions about whether to proceed with batch execution, adjust grouping, or modify device settings, thereby maintaining both efficiency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If users manually check and adjust device settings before each job execution, then job executability is ensured, but operational complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob executabilityVSAvoiduser operational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs the checking and matching of job conditions with device status, eliminating the need for users to manually verify compatibility. The controller compares job conditions (recording media type, copies, post-processes) with current device status and automatically identifies executable jobs or grouping opportunities, reducing user burden while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users about the compatibility status of accumulated jobs with current device settings. This feedback includes information about which jobs can be executed immediately, which require device adjustments, and how jobs might be grouped for efficient batch processing. This automated feedback reduces user burden while maintaining job executability reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11350008B2Image recording apparatus and image recording job grouping method
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US11350008B2 patent drawing
  • US11350008B2 patent drawing
  • US11350008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller is configured to store a received print job in a RAM or an EEPROM, determine whether to group multiple print jobs in response to receipt of input to an input I/F, obtain device status information in response to determine to grouping the multiple print jobs, generate size information and sheet information matching to the device status information as a group key, group the multiple print jobs including size information and sheet information matching the group key, and display the group, in a selectable manner, as a subject of image recording on a display.