Print Job Holding Flag for Storage Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In combined printing apparatus functions, user-selected print data storage can be inadvertently deleted at a preset automatic timing, leading to potential loss of important print jobs and storage capacity constraints.

Innovation Solution

The printing apparatus includes a user interface, display, printing device, and controller that allows users to select whether to hold or delete print jobs after printing, with a holding flag preventing automatic deletion and periodic checks to maintain storage of desired print jobs while removing unnecessary ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If automatic deletion function is implemented to delete print jobs at preset timing, then storage capacity is maintained by removing old jobs, but user-selected print jobs may be inadvertently deleted despite user intention to retain them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidjob retention reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by setting a holding flag on print jobs that the user wants to retain before the automatic deletion timing occurs. This flag is set in advance during the print job selection process, ensuring that these jobs are protected from automatic deletion at the preset timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback by checking the holding flag status of each print job at the automatic deletion timing. The controller determines whether to delete a job based on the presence or absence of the holding flag, creating a feedback mechanism that prevents deletion of user-selected jobs while allowing deletion of others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If user selection interface is provided for storing or deleting print jobs after printing, then user control over print job storage is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidsystem processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the storage control function into a separate holding flag mechanism. Instead of integrating storage control logic throughout the printing process, the system separates it into a distinct flag-setting operation that occurs at the user selection interface, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by allowing users to automatically set the holding flag through the selection interface without requiring manual intervention at deletion timing. The controller automatically checks and acts on the holding flag status, reducing the need for complex user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Duration of action of stationary object

If print jobs are deleted at predetermined periodic intervals, then storage device capacity is managed, but important print jobs may be lost due to automatic deletion timing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob storage durationVSAvoidjob safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The holding flag is set in advance during the print job selection process, before the predetermined periodic deletion timing occurs. This preliminary action ensures that important jobs are marked for retention prior to the automatic deletion cycle, preventing their loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller checks the holding flag status at each periodic deletion timing and uses this feedback to determine whether to delete each job. This feedback mechanism ensures that jobs marked for retention are protected while maintaining the periodic deletion schedule for other jobs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11934728B2Printing apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US11934728B2 patent drawing
  • US11934728B2 patent drawing
  • US11934728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Printing apparatus includes a controller is configured to executes holding selection processing of allowing holding in a storage device or deletion from the storage device of a storage of a print job selected by a print job selection processing to be selected by a user's input operation received via the user interface. The print job for which holding of the storage of the print job is selected is stored in the storage device in association with a holding flag. When the holding flag is associated with the print job stored in the storage device, the print job is not deleted from the storage device at a predetermined automatic deletion timing. When the holding flag is not associated with the print job stored in the storage device, the print job is deleted from the storage device at the automatic deletion timing.