Print Image Layout for Fewer Post-Processing Tool Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing printing systems require frequent replacement of post-processing tools like cutter blades due to varying types of post-processing, leading to inefficient operation when nested printing is performed without considering the type of post-processing to be executed.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device that includes an image acceptance unit, a post-processing information acquisition unit, and an arrangement processing unit to optimize the arrangement of images based on post-processing information, minimizing the number of adjacent images requiring different post-processing tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If nested printing is performed without considering post-processing information, then images can be printed side by side efficiently, but post-processing tool replacement frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting efficiencyVSAvoidpost-processing interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary arrangement processing before printing to group images with the same post-processing information together. This preliminary organization of images ensures that when post-processing is executed, tools like cutter blades need to be replaced less frequently, thereby reducing interruptions and improving overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the arrangement parameters of images based on their post-processing information. By dynamically adjusting the arrangement strategy according to the specific post-processing requirements of each image, the system minimizes the number of tool replacements needed during post-processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If images are arranged without considering post-processing types, then arrangement processing is simple, but the number of adjacent different types increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrangement processing complexityVSAvoidpost-processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different arrangement strategies to different regions or groups of images based on their specific post-processing information. Instead of using a uniform arrangement method for all images, it locally optimizes the arrangement for each group with the same post-processing requirements, thereby reducing the number of adjacent different types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The arrangement processing dynamically adjusts parameters such as image grouping and positioning based on post-processing information. This parameter change enables the system to minimize adjacent different types while maintaining reasonable arrangement complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If post-processing tool replacement is performed frequently, then each image can receive appropriate post-processing, but post-processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-processing adaptabilityVSAvoidpost-processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges adjacent images that have the same post-processing information into groups. By combining these images in the arrangement phase, the system ensures that the same post-processing tool can handle multiple images continuously without replacement, thereby maintaining both adaptability and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The arrangement strategy ensures continuous use of the same post-processing tool for grouped images with identical requirements. This continuity eliminates interruptions caused by frequent tool replacements, maintaining high post-processing efficiency while still accommodating diverse post-processing needs through proper grouping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260075150A1Information processing device, control method for information processing device, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing program
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US20260075150A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075150A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075150A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device is provided, the device including: an image acceptance unit configured to accept a plurality of images to be print targets; a post-processing information acquisition unit configured to acquire post-processing information for each of the plurality of images, the post-processing information being information corresponding to the images and being information about post-processing to be executed after execution of printing; and an arrangement processing unit configured to execute arrangement processing, which is processing of setting an arrangement of the plurality of images on a medium, based on the post-processing information, wherein when a number of adjacent images having different post-processing information, of the plurality of images, is defined as a number of adjacent different types, the arrangement processing unit executes the arrangement processing such that the number of adjacent different types after the arrangement processing is smaller than the number of adjacent different types before the arrangement processing.