Print Server RIP Processing Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional print server systems perform RIP processing centrally, leading to inefficiencies when the image forming apparatus has greater processing capacity or when data transfer speed is low, resulting in longer output times and ineffective printing.

Innovation Solution

A print server that compares the time required for RIP processing on both the server and the image forming apparatus, transferring either PDL data or raster data based on which method results in a shorter output time, taking into account processing capacities and data transfer speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If RIP processing is performed centrally on the print server, then the image forming apparatus can be designed with simpler configuration, but the output time increases and printing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage forming apparatus configurationVSAvoidprinting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic RIP processing by allowing the system to switch between centralized RIP on the print server and distributed RIP on the image forming apparatus based on real-time conditions such as processing capacity and data transfer speed. This dynamic allocation resolves the contradiction by adapting the RIP location to optimize both device simplicity and printing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of RIP processing location from a fixed centralized model to a flexible model that can be either on the print server or image forming apparatus. By evaluating parameters such as processing capacity and network speed, the system selects the optimal RIP location, thereby improving printing efficiency without significantly complicating the image forming apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If RIP processing is performed on the print server, then the image forming apparatus does not need RIP function, but the data transfer time increases due to larger raster data size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage forming apparatus designVSAvoiddata transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects whether to perform RIP on the print server or image forming apparatus based on network data transfer speed. When network speed is low, RIP is performed on the image forming apparatus to avoid transmitting large raster data, thus reducing data transmission time while maintaining simple image forming apparatus design through optional RIP functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of data format from fixed raster data to a variable approach that selects between PDL data and raster data based on network conditions. When network speed is low, the system transmits smaller PDL data for local RIP processing, thereby reducing data transmission time while keeping the image forming apparatus design relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If the image forming apparatus has greater RIP processing capacity, then it can process faster, but the conventional system still uses server-side RIP causing longer output time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRIP processing capacityVSAvoidoutput time
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the image forming apparatus to perform self-service RIP processing when it has sufficient processing capacity. By evaluating its own RIP capabilities, the image forming apparatus can independently process PDL data locally, eliminating the bottleneck of server-side RIP and reducing output time while utilizing its existing processing power effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the print server evaluates the RIP processing capacity of the image forming apparatus and adjusts the RIP location accordingly. When the image forming apparatus demonstrates sufficient processing capacity, the system feeds back this information and switches to local RIP processing, thereby reducing output time and utilizing the available processing power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Speed

If network data transfer speed is low, then transmitting smaller PDL data would be more efficient, but conventional systems transmit large raster data causing longer transmission time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer efficiencyVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the data format parameter from fixed raster data to a conditional selection between PDL and raster data based on network speed. When network transfer speed is low, the system selects PDL data format which has smaller size, thereby improving data transfer efficiency and reducing transmission time while maintaining the ability to produce high-quality output through local RIP processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8908207B2Print server, print control system and print control method having a raster image processor (RIP) function
Publication Date: 2014.12.09 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS TECH INC
  • US8908207B2 patent drawing
  • US8908207B2 patent drawing
  • US8908207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A print server is linked through a communication network to a client device for sending PDL data, and an image forming apparatus provided with a RIP section for creating raster data by rasterizing the PDL data and a printer section for executing printing according to the raster data. This print server is provided with at least a RIP section for creating raster data by rasterizing the PDL data received from the client device, and a control section that compares the time to be taken before output when the PDL data received from the aforementioned client device is sent to the image forming apparatus with the time to be taken before output when the raster data created by the RIP section of the printer server is sent to the image forming apparatus, whereby the data whose length of time before the output is shorter is sent to the image forming apparatus.