Automated Print Service Network with Distributed Providers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online printing services face limitations such as data transfer issues over low bandwidth connections, poor reliability, unattended print devices, human error, high costs for unique print articles, and lack of scalability, with current solutions not fully automating print ordering, job routing, or content transmission.

Innovation Solution

An automated print on demand service over the internet that matches customers with suitable print service providers, optimizing print media usage and minimizing manual intervention, using a network of computer entities and printer devices to receive orders, allocate print jobs efficiently, and manage the entire production process from ordering to shipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized printing facilities are used, then print service reliability is improved, but scalability and adaptability to different customers are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint service reliabilityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the printing service into multiple distributed print service providers instead of a single centralized facility. Each provider operates independently but connects through a common network interface, allowing the system to scale by adding more providers without requiring changes to the core architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The print interface server provides a universal interface that works with multiple different print service providers and various printing technologies. This multi-functional approach allows the same system to adapt to different customers and requirements while maintaining reliability through standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If manual print device monitoring is used, then device availability can be checked, but human error and unattendedness increase operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice availabilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms where print service providers and print interface servers continuously report their status, availability, and performance metrics. This automated feedback loop eliminates the need for manual monitoring while maintaining high reliability through real-time status tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Print service providers and interface servers automatically manage their own operations, including job acceptance, status reporting, and error handling. This self-service capability reduces human intervention to minimal levels while maintaining device availability through automated monitoring and alerting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If proprietary internet enabled drivers are used, then direct customer service is improved, but system complexity and vendor lock-in increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer serviceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal print interface server that can handle multiple print protocols and communicate with various print service providers through standardized interfaces. This eliminates the need for proprietary drivers while maintaining ease of operation through a consistent user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The print interface server acts as an intermediary between customers and multiple print service providers, translating customer requests into provider-specific formats and vice versa. This mediator approach simplifies the system by providing a single point of contact while supporting multiple underlying systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If print jobs are routed manually, then job allocation can be controlled, but automation and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob allocation controlVSAvoidprint ordering automation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated feedback from print service providers regarding their current workload, capacity, and status to dynamically route print jobs. This automated routing maintains control over job allocation while eliminating manual intervention, achieving both reliability and automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Job routing is dynamically adjusted based on real-time conditions at various print service providers, such as current workload, available capacity, and service levels. This dynamic routing automates the allocation process while maintaining control through adaptive decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Adaptability or versatility

If multiple media types require device setup changes, then print versatility is improved, but production time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemedia type versatilityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring print service providers for multiple media types and maintaining ready-to-use templates for different print requirements. This allows rapid switching between media types without requiring physical device reconfiguration, maintaining versatility while reducing production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically assigns print jobs to providers based on their current configuration and capability for the required media type. This dynamic allocation allows the system to handle multiple media types efficiently by routing to appropriately configured providers without requiring physical changes to devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7620569B2Method and apparatus for automated on-line printing service
Publication Date: 2009.11.17 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US7620569B2 patent drawing
  • US7620569B2 patent drawing
  • US7620569B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed an on-line print network comprising a print merchant computer, and a plurality of print service providers. Within each print service provider, orders are satisfied efficiently by optimizing throughput of print jobs within the print service provider, whilst at the same time, minimizing media wastage and achieving high printer device utilization, under control of a print manager computer interfacing with the print merchant computer on the one hand, and with the plurality of printer devices on the other hand.