Printable Coating Structure for Fine Art Crackle Reproduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for reproducing textured cracking patterns in fine art reproductions, such as using mechanical means or thick inkjet receptive coatings, are either short-lived or prone to flaking, leading to poor image quality and increased process complexity.

Innovation Solution

A printable article comprising a substrate, a barrier layer to reduce substrate porosity, and an image receiving layer with specific binders and pigments that induce cracking upon application of liquid marking materials or laminates, allowing for the formation of seemingly random cracking patterns without direct bonding to the substrate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mechanical means are used to cut or emboss a cracking pattern in the finished article, then a cracking pattern can be reproduced, but the solution does not last long enough and adds to the process complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecracking pattern reproductionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical cutting or embossing methods with a chemical formulation approach. The cracking pattern is achieved through the inherent properties of the inkjet receptive coating materials (binders with specific glass transition temperatures) rather than mechanical intervention. This substitution eliminates complex mechanical equipment and multi-step processes while achieving the desired cracking effect through material science.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the binder materials, specifically the glass transition temperature (Tg), to control cracking behavior. By selecting binders with Tg values between -50°C to 50°C, the coating becomes sufficiently flexible during printing but then cracks as it cools and contracts. This parameter-based approach replaces complex mechanical processes with controllable material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the printable surface is produced with sufficient thickness to induce cracking, then cracking can be induced, but the approach is prone to flaking of the IRC which can lead to poor image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecracking patternVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material formulation with specific binder combinations (natural resin and synthetic polymer in 20:80 to 80:20 ratios) that create a cohesive structure resistant to flaking. The composite approach allows the coating to crack in a controlled manner while maintaining adhesion to the substrate, preventing the IRC from flaking off and compromising image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the thickness and composition parameters of the inkjet receptive coating to achieve cracking without flaking. By optimizing the binder ratio and Tg parameters, the coating develops controlled micro-cracks that create the desired aesthetic effect while maintaining sufficient adhesion strength to prevent large-scale flaking that would degrade image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves durable and high-quality cracking patterns without mechanical intervention, improving structural integrity and optical properties of the printed article, while maintaining image quality and reducing process complexity.

Implementation Method 1

The application of the marking materials and/or liquid laminate causes such image receiving layers to swell (e.g., expand) through the absorption of water or other solvents found in these materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

upon drying, uneven shrinkage of the image receiving layer produces seemingly random cracking patterns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS8709554B2Printable and printed articles
Publication Date: 2014.04.29 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US8709554B2 patent drawing
  • US8709554B2 patent drawing
  • US8709554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Printable articles including a substrate, an image receiving layer over the substrate, and a barrier layer between the substrate and the image receiving layer are useful in the production of fine art reproductions. The image receiving layer comprises at least one pigment and two or more binders, wherein at least one of the two or more binders has a glass transition temperature (Tg) at least 20° C. less than a Tg of at least one other of the two or more binders. Printed articles including a printable article with marking material contained in the image receiving layer may exhibit a textured cracking pattern after application and drying of the marking material or a liquid laminate.