3D-Printed Ceramic Preforms for Complex Metal Matrix Composite Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing metal matrix composites are costly, require expensive tooling, and are limited in producing complex geometries and high filler volume fractions, especially when using ceramic reinforcement materials.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing 3D printing to create ceramic preforms, followed by infiltration with liquid metal, allowing for the formation of metal matrix composite parts with customizable microstructures and complex geometries without the need for expensive tooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If conventional manufacturing methods are used for metal matrix composites, then manufacturing process is established, but manufacturing cost is high and complex geometries cannot be produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex geometriesVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing process parameters by transitioning from conventional subtractive or formative methods to additive manufacturing (3D printing). This enables complex geometries to be produced directly without expensive tooling, while also allowing control over filler distribution parameters to achieve desired material properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by first creating a porous ceramic preform with the desired complex geometry through 3D printing, then infiltrating it with molten metal. This sequence allows the complex shape to be established before metal infiltration, avoiding the need for expensive molds and tooling required in conventional simultaneous formation methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If conventional manufacturing methods are used, then production is possible, but filler volume fraction is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiller volume fractionVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes porous ceramic preforms as the basis for metal matrix composite production. The porous structure allows high volume fractions of ceramic filler to be incorporated while maintaining manufacturability, as the pores are subsequently filled with molten metal during infiltration. This approach overcomes the limitation of conventional methods that struggle to achieve high filler content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process is segmented into distinct stages: (1) 3D printing of ceramic preform with controlled porosity, (2) drying and sintering of the preform, and (3) infiltration with molten metal. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each stage, enabling high filler volume fractions to be achieved while maintaining ease of manufacture through process control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Shape

If 3D printing is used to create ceramic preforms, then complex geometries and varied filler volume fractions are achieved, but additional processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex geometriesVSAvoidprocessing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into the 3D printing process itself. The ceramic preform is printed with integrated porosity control and complex geometry in a single additive manufacturing step, eliminating the need for separate molding, shaping, and filler distribution steps required in conventional methods. The infiltration step then completes the composite formation without requiring additional complex equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of metal matrix composite parts with varied filler volume fractions and complex geometries, reducing manufacturing costs and enabling rapid design iterations.

Implementation Method 1

introducing a liquid metal into the sintered preform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

sintering the ceramic preform to form a sintered preform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS12421573B2Method of manufacturing metal matrix composite parts
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 MARKFORGED INC
  • US12421573B2 patent drawing
  • US12421573B2 patent drawing
  • US12421573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method of manufacturing a metal matrix composite part and ceramic preform assembly for use in the method. The method includes forming a ceramic preform using 3D printing, sintering the ceramic preform to form a sintered preform, introducing a liquid metal into the sintered preform to form the metal matrix composite part. The ceramic preform may be part of a ceramic preform assembly includes at least one ceramic preform and an infiltrant reservoir connected to the ceramic preform. The method may also include forming the ceramic preform assembly using 3D printing.