3D Printed Insulating Element for Vehicle Cavities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing insulating elements for vehicle cavities are costly due to high investment requirements for tools, especially for small series production, and struggle with creating complex three-dimensional shapes.

Innovation Solution

An insulating element comprising a carrier element made of a high-temperature solid material and an expandable element, printed in a limited number of layers using three-dimensional printing, allowing for efficient production of complex shapes without high tooling costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional injection molding process is used to produce insulating elements, then manufacturing precision and reliability are improved, but investment costs and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsulating element geometry precisionVSAvoidtooling investment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the production method from conventional injection molding to 3D printing, fundamentally altering the manufacturing parameters. This allows complex geometries to be produced without expensive molds, reducing tooling investment while maintaining geometric precision through digital modeling and additive manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical injection molding system with a 3D printing system that uses digital files and layered material deposition. This substitution eliminates the need for physical molds and tooling, significantly reducing investment costs while maintaining the ability to produce complex insulating element geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If injection molding process is used for large series production, then production costs per unit decrease, but investment costs and production time increase for small series

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidproduction setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses 3D printing technology that allows digital models to be prepared in advance without requiring physical mold setup. This preliminary digital preparation enables rapid production switching between different insulating element designs, eliminating mold changeover time and making small series production as efficient as large series production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic production system where the manufacturing process can be easily adjusted by changing digital parameters rather than physical tooling. This dynamic approach allows the production system to adapt quickly to different production volumes and designs, optimizing efficiency for both small and large series without fixed mold constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If alternative production methods like profile extrusion or multi-layer stamping are used, then investment costs decrease, but manufacturing precision and geometric complexity capability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction investment costVSAvoidinsulating element geometric complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes from traditional subtractive or formative methods (extrusion, stamping) to additive manufacturing. This parameter change enables the production of complex three-dimensional geometries that cannot be achieved with extrusion or stamping, while maintaining low investment costs through the elimination of expensive molds and tooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If complex three-dimensional shapes are produced using conventional methods, then sealing and reinforcement effectiveness are improved, but production costs and tooling complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing and reinforcement effectivenessVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing approach to 3D printing, which directly deposits material in the final complex geometry without requiring multi-step tooling processes. This enables effective sealing and reinforcement shapes to be produced in a single additive process, maintaining reliability while significantly reducing production costs and eliminating complex tooling requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces production time and costs by using fewer layers and coarser material strands, enabling cost-effective production of insulating elements for both small and large series, while accommodating complex geometries and enhancing structural reinforcement and sealing.

Implementation Method 1

the second material being expandable at a temperature between 120° C. and 200° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentEP3551503B1Printed insulating element
Publication Date: 2020.10.14 SIKA TECH AG
  • EP3551503B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2b
  • EP3551503B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~4b
  • EP3551503B1 patent drawingFigure 5a~7b

AI summary

The invention relates to a damping element (16) for damping a structured element (12, 14) in a vehicle, comprising a support element (11) and an expandable element (13). The support element consists of at least one printed material strand (1) of a first material, which is in a solid aggregate state at least up to a temperature between 120 °C and 200 °C, and the expandable element consists of at least one printed material strand (3) of a second material, which is expandable at a temperature between 120 °C and 200 °C. The damping element has at least two and maximally ten layers which lie one over the other at the thickest point (5) measured perpendicularly to a plane (22) of the damping element.