Printed Nonvolatile Memory Cell Using Segmented Gate Oxides

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nonvolatile memory devices based on floating-gate transistors have finite lifetimes due to degradation of charge storage capability during electrical erase processes, limiting their operational cycles to around 10^5 write operations, and require costly and time-consuming masking steps in manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

The development of a nonvolatile memory cell using a printed TFT process flow with a single floating gate and two gate oxides, where semiconductor islands are formed by printing silicon ink and doped dielectric films, eliminating the need for additional dielectric deposition and patterning steps, and allowing for improved carrier mobility and gate oxide interface quality through sequential lateral laser solidification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electrical erase process is used in floating-gate transistor memory, then memory can be reset or erased, but charge storage capability degrades limiting lifetime to 10^5 write operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory erase capabilityVSAvoidcharge storage capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The gate oxide is segmented into two distinct layers: a first gate oxide layer for charge storage and a second gate oxide layer for tunneling operations. This segmentation allows the charge storage layer to remain undisturbed during erase operations, while the tunneling layer handles the stress of repeated programming/erasing cycles, thereby preserving charge storage capability while maintaining operational functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional masking steps are used in manufacturing, then precise patterning can be achieved, but manufacturing cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional photolithographic masking (a mechanical/optical system) with a direct printing system that deposits patterned materials directly onto the substrate. This printing-based approach eliminates the need for separate masking steps while achieving the required patterning precision, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity, cost, and cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If printed TFT process flow is used, then manufacturing cost decreases and throughput increases, but process control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple conventional manufacturing steps into a single printed TFT process flow. The printing system simultaneously performs material deposition, patterning, and doping in one integrated process, eliminating the need for separate masking, deposition, and etching steps. This merging of operations simplifies overall process control while dramatically increasing throughput and reducing manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances retention time and reduces manufacturing costs by eliminating masking steps, achieving reliable electrical characteristics and improved data retention without extra processing steps, enabling higher throughput and lower production costs.

Implementation Method 1

The act of programming the cell to a predetermined state (other than an erased state) involves charging the floating gate with electrons, which causes the turn-on threshold of the memory cell to increase.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFowler-Nordheim tunneling:

Implementation Method 2

The floating gate on at least part of the gate dielectric layer and the tunneling dielectric layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical charge storage: Capacitance

Implementation Method 3

improved carrier mobility and gate oxide interface quality through sequential lateral laser solidification

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser solidification: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS8796774B2Printed non-volatile memory
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 ENSURGE MICROPOWER ASA
  • US8796774B2 patent drawing
  • US8796774B2 patent drawing
  • US8796774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A nonvolatile memory cell is disclosed, having first and second semiconductor islands at the same horizontal level and spaced a predetermined distance apart, the first semiconductor island providing a control gate and the second semiconductor island providing source and drain terminals; a gate dielectric layer on at least part of the first semiconductor island; a tunneling dielectric layer on at least part of the second semiconductor island; a floating gate on at least part of the gate dielectric layer and the tunneling dielectric layer; and a metal layer in electrical contact with the control gate and the source and drain terminals. In one advantageous embodiment, the nonvolatile memory cell may be manufactured using an “all-printed” process technology.