3D Printer Anomaly Detection via Measurement Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing technologies lack a method to effectively determine and address printing errors and calibration issues, leading to inefficient resource usage, increased maintenance costs, and unpredictable downtime.

Innovation Solution

A device that obtains and processes measurement data from 3D printed objects to identify printing anomalies and calibration issues, generating instructions to adjust the 3D printer and prevent future errors, thereby reducing resource waste and maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If 3D printing is performed without anomaly detection, then printing speed and productivity are maintained, but printing errors and calibration issues occur leading to resource waste and increased maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidprinting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary anomaly detection by obtaining measurement data from the 3D printed object and comparing it against expected parameters before the printing process completes. This allows identification of printing anomalies and calibration issues early, enabling corrective actions to be taken before significant resource waste occurs, thus maintaining both productivity and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where measurement data from the printed object is continuously analyzed to detect printing anomalies. The generated instructions are fed back to adjust the 3D printer settings, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains printing accuracy without sacrificing productivity through real-time or near-real-time monitoring and adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If measurement data is obtained and processed to detect printing anomalies, then printing accuracy and reliability are improved, but device complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the 3D printer to self-diagnose and self-correct by automatically obtaining measurement data, processing it to identify anomalies, and generating adjustment instructions. This self-service capability improves printing accuracy without requiring complex external monitoring systems or manual inspection processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system focuses on monitoring and adjusting key printing parameters through measurement data analysis. By concentrating on critical parameters rather than comprehensive system monitoring, the solution achieves improved printing accuracy while maintaining relatively simple device architecture and avoiding excessive operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If printing anomalies are detected and addressed, then resource waste is reduced, but measurement and processing time are added to the workflow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement and anomaly detection process is integrated into the printing workflow at strategic points, allowing detection before significant material is wasted. By performing measurements during or immediately after printing rather than after complete fabrication, the system minimizes both material waste and total measurement time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial measurement action by focusing on critical features and parameters of the printed object that are most indicative of printing anomalies. This selective measurement approach reduces the total measurement and processing time while still effectively identifying issues that would lead to material waste, achieving a balance between detection thoroughness and time efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11701834B2Determining a printing anomaly related to a 3D printed object
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US11701834B2 patent drawing
  • US11701834B2 patent drawing
  • US11701834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may obtain measurement data concerning a three-dimensional (3D) printed object, where the 3D printed object has a plurality of physical elements that comprise a plurality of different physical attributes, and where the plurality of physical elements and the plurality of different physical attributes are designed to exhibit one or more printing capabilities of a 3D printer that printed the 3D printed object. The device may process the measurement data to determine one or more printing anomalies relating to one or more physical elements, of the plurality of physical elements, and one or more physical attributes of the plurality of different physical attributes. The device may generate a set of instructions to permit the 3D printer to be adjusted to address the one or more printing anomalies, and may cause an action to be performed based on generating the set of instructions.