Printer Calibration Using Ink Drop Variation Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional printer re-linearization techniques are time-consuming and costly, leading to inconsistent color output due to variations in drop size and ink weight over the printer's operational life, often resulting in suboptimal print results as users refrain from frequent calibration.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an initial reference measurement of colorimetric parameters using a calibration pattern with selected ink drop numbers, allowing for the generation of compensation data to modify pre-built linearizations and adjust ink drop numbers for accurate color reproduction, thereby simplifying and accelerating the calibration process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional re-linearization techniques are used, then manufacturing precision of color output is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming calibration processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor output consistencyVSAvoidcalibration speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of measurement data quantity from extensive (conventional) to limited (one or more measurement values per ink channel). This allows the system to use a simplified model with fewer parameters that still achieves acceptable linearization accuracy, thereby reducing calibration time while maintaining color output consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential measurement data needed for linearization (one or more measurement values per ink channel) from the complete set of possible measurements. By taking out only the critical parameters and discarding redundant information, the calibration process becomes faster while still achieving the necessary color consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional re-linearization techniques are used, then manufacturing precision of color output is improved, but loss of time increases due to extensive calibration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor output consistencyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing only the minimum necessary measurements (one or more values per ink channel) rather than comprehensive measurements across all ink channels and conditions. This partial measurement approach is sufficient to achieve the required color consistency while dramatically reducing the time investment required for calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by establishing a simplified linearization model in advance that can be quickly updated with minimal measurement data. This pre-established model structure allows for rapid recalibration when color drift occurs, reducing the time loss associated with frequent calibration needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional re-linearization techniques are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to extensive measurement and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor output consistencyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the complexity parameter by reducing the number of measurement parameters from extensive to limited (one or more per ink channel). This parameter reduction simplifies the measurement system, data processing requirements, and overall calibration workflow while maintaining sufficient color output precision through the use of an appropriate simplified model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2979441B1Printer calibration
Publication Date: 2019.08.28 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • EP2979441B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2979441B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2979441B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3B

AI summary

Techniques related to printer calibration are disclosed herein. In an example, an actual measurement of a colorimetric parameter is performed by measuring the colorimetric parameter on a printed calibration pattern. The colorimetric parameter is associated with an ink drop number. The calibration pattern is printed with selected printing conditions. An ink drop number variation is determined from a reference measurement and the actual measurement of the colorimetric parameter. The reference measurement is a measurement of a colorimetric parameter. The reference measurement corresponds to a measurement of the colorimetric parameter on a calibration pattern printed with the selected printing conditions. An actual linearization is generated by validating a set of pre-defined linearizations with the determined ink drop number variation. Other examples of printer calibration are disclosed.