Printer Casing Frame Layout for Lower Weight and Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming apparatuses are heavy due to the use of heavy metal pillars and side plates, making them cumbersome and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

The image forming apparatus is redesigned with a casing that includes a first frame, a second frame, a side cover, and a top cover, featuring pillar portions that overlap and support each other vertically, reducing the weight and improving structural integrity while maintaining functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metal pillars and side plates are used to form the frame structure, then the structural strength and stability are improved, but the weight and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite construction by combining resin materials for the frame structure with metal materials for the pillar portions. The resin frame provides basic structural support and cost-effectiveness, while the metal pillar portions reinforce critical load-bearing areas. This composite approach achieves sufficient structural strength while significantly reducing overall weight compared to fully metal constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by using metal materials specifically for the pillar portions rather than the entire frame structure. The resin frame is used for non-critical areas where full metal strength is not required, while metal pillar portions are strategically placed at locations needing enhanced strength and stability. This localized metal reinforcement achieves the necessary structural integrity with minimal weight penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If metal pillars and side plates are used to form the frame structure, then the structural stability is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials to reduce manufacturing cost while maintaining structural stability. The resin frame portions are cost-effective and easier to manufacture, while the metal pillar portions provide necessary stability reinforcement. This combination achieves sufficient structural stability at a lower manufacturing cost than fully metal constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using metal materials only where structural stability is critical (pillar portions) while using more cost-effective resin materials for the remaining frame structure. This selective material application maintains necessary stability in key areas while significantly reducing overall manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If resin covers are used to form pillar structures, then the weight and cost are reduced, but the stiffness may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent overcomes the stiffness limitation of resin by creating a composite structure where resin covers form the basic pillar shape and weight reduction, while embedded metal reinforcement elements provide the necessary stiffness and structural strength. This composite approach achieves both weight reduction and sufficient stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite construction by combining resin materials for the frame structure with metal materials for the pillar portions. The resin frame provides basic structural support and cost-effectiveness, while the metal pillar portions reinforce critical load-bearing areas. This composite approach achieves sufficient structural strength while significantly reducing overall weight compared to fully metal constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12619189B2Image forming apparatus with a casing including particularly arranged frames and covers
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 CANON KK
  • US12619189B2 patent drawing
  • US12619189B2 patent drawing
  • US12619189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus includes an image forming unit including an image bearing member, and a casing on which a discharge port is formed, the casing including a first frame, a second frame disposed below the first frame in a vertical direction, a side cover, and a top cover, the first frame including a side plate that supports an end, in a longitudinal direction, of the image bearing member. At least one of the top cover and the first frame includes a first pillar portion. The second frame includes a second pillar portion. The side cover includes a third pillar portion disposed between the first pillar portion and the second pillar portion in the vertical direction, the third pillar portion being provided at a position at least partially overlapping with the first pillar portion and the second pillar portion when viewed in the vertical direction.