Printer Copy-Forgery-Inhibited Pattern Synthesis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing printing systems face challenges in effectively managing copy-forgery-inhibited patterns, as the settings for these patterns can differ between the host unit and the printing apparatus, leading to contention and hindering the build-up of an efficient printing system, especially when connected via internet or other networks.
Innovation Solution
A printer system is developed with a synthesizing unit that allows users to select and prioritize either the copy-forgery-inhibited pattern set in the host unit or the printing apparatus, synthesizing the selected pattern with the received printing data, and notifies users of potential contentions, ensuring appropriate printing regardless of setting differences.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If copy-forgery-inhibited pattern settings are allowed to differ between host unit and printing apparatus, then user flexibility and adaptability are improved, but setting contention and system complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic selection of copy-forgery-inhibited pattern settings based on print job attributes. The printing apparatus determines whether to use host-unit settings or apparatus settings by evaluating job characteristics (e.g., job ID, user ID, attribute information), allowing the system to adaptively switch between setting sources rather than maintaining a fixed configuration. This resolves the contradiction by making the setting selection flexible and context-dependent.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary determination mechanism that mediates between host-unit settings and apparatus settings. The printing apparatus acts as an intermediary by receiving settings from the host unit, evaluating them against job attributes, and selectively applying either host settings or apparatus settings based on the evaluation. This intermediary layer prevents direct conflict between the two setting sources while maintaining both as valid options.
2Ease of operation
If copy-forgery-inhibited pattern settings are allowed to differ between host unit and printing apparatus, then user preference accommodation is improved, but contention resolution complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically selects which settings to apply based on real-time evaluation of print job attributes. Rather than requiring manual resolution of setting conflicts or following a fixed priority rule, the system adapts its behavior according to the specific job being processed, making operation easier for users with different preferences while keeping the resolution mechanism relatively simple.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter being controlled from a static setting priority to a dynamic selection based on job attributes. By evaluating attributes such as job ID, user ID, and other job-specific information, the system determines which setting source to use on a per-job basis, simplifying the contention resolution process compared to complex hierarchical or manual resolution systems.
3Reliability
If copy-forgery-inhibited pattern is synthesized with printing data, then copy-forgery inhibition function is improved, but printing process complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary determination of which copy-forgery-inhibited pattern settings to use during the print job reception phase, before the actual printing process begins. The printing apparatus evaluates job attributes and selects the appropriate settings source (host unit or apparatus) in advance, so that the subsequent printing process simply applies the predetermined settings without complex real-time decision-making, thus reducing printing process complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent extracts the setting determination logic from the printing process itself and places it in the job reception and preparation phase. By separating the setting selection function from the printing execution function, the system maintains reliable copy-forgery inhibition while keeping the actual printing process simple and straightforward.
Data Source
AI summary
A copy-forgery-inhibited (CFI) pattern image is effectively printed irrespective of difference in information of (CFI) pattern setting between a host unit and a printing apparatus in relation to printing of a (CFI) pattern image. A (CFI) pattern image, for example, “COPY INHIBIT” is set on the printer side while a (CFI) pattern image “COPY” is set under a printing instruction delivered from a host PC. If determination is resulted in inconsistency between strings, indication for asking the user which (CFI) pattern image is given preference to be displayed on an UI screen of the printer. Further, similar indication is displayed on the host PC side. Thus, it is possible to render the user to determine whether the setting of a (CFI) pattern image on the host PC side is given preference to or the setting on the printer side is given preference to.


