Printer Cutter Error Recovery Control Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Printers with cutters often face difficulties in recovering from cutter errors due to foreign objects or jammed paper, leading to repeated user attempts at error recovery operations without resolving the issue.

Innovation Solution

A control method for printers that detects non-recoverable cutter errors and prevents repeated error recovery operations by using external device commands, power status, and cover detection to ensure the cutter returns to its home position only after obstacles are removed, allowing the printer to switch to offline mode and continue printing without cutting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the printer executes error recovery operation repeatedly when cutter error occurs, then the user can attempt to resolve the error, but the user may waste time repeatedly attempting recovery without removing the foreign object or jammed paper

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror recovery operationVSAvoidtime for repeated error recovery attempts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The printer monitors the cutter position after each error recovery operation and provides feedback by detecting whether the cutter knife has returned to the home position. When the cutter error persists despite recovery attempts, the system identifies this as a non-recoverable error and notifies the user, preventing further wasted recovery attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects non-recoverable errors by monitoring cutter position feedback and autonomously determines when to stop offering error recovery operations. This self-diagnosis capability prevents the user from continuing futile recovery attempts by clearly indicating when manual intervention to remove the foreign object or jammed paper is required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the printer continues to offer error recovery operation after foreign object or jammed paper is present, then the user can attempt recovery, but the cutter blade cannot return to home position and the error persists

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror recovery capabilityVSAvoidcutter error recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the cutter position detection to assess whether error recovery is successful. When the cutter knife fails to return to the home position after an error recovery operation, the system identifies this as a non-recoverable error condition, indicating the presence of a foreign object or jammed paper that requires user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of the cutter position before and after error recovery operations to determine whether the cutter error is recoverable. This preliminary assessment prevents futile recovery attempts by identifying non-recoverable errors early and notifying the user to remove the obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If the printer reports cutter error and prompts user to remove foreign object, then the user can resolve the issue, but the user may not understand that repeated recovery attempts without removing the object are ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror status informationVSAvoiduser understanding of error recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides clear feedback by distinguishing between recoverable and non-recoverable error states. When the cutter error persists after an error recovery operation, the system notifies the user that it is a non-recoverable error, clearly indicating that manual removal of the foreign object or jammed paper is required rather than continuing with automated recovery attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9940562B2Control method of a printer, and printer
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9940562B2 patent drawing
  • US9940562B2 patent drawing
  • US9940562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printer control method prevents the user from repeatedly executing an error recovery operation when a cutter error occurs. The printer 2 has a cutter 22 that moves a movable knife 32 between a home position HP and cutting position CP and cuts recording paper 6 at the cutting position CP. When a cutter error in which the movable knife 32 does not return from the home position HP is detected (step ST5), the host device 3 reports a cutter error (step ST6). When the printer 2 executes a cutter error recovery operation (step ST9) and again detects a cutter error (step ST5), it detects a non-recoverable error as being unable to recover from the cutter error (step ST10), and reports the non-recoverable error (step ST11).