Printer Image Quality Recovery After Consumable Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing methods fail to adequately adjust image quality after consumable replacements in printers, leading to undesired changes in image quality and requiring significant user effort for manual calibration.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that includes a storage for storing image quality information before and after maintenance, and a hardware processor to adjust image quality post-maintenance, ensuring consistency with the initial quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If calibration is performed after consumable replacement to maintain target image quality, then image quality consistency with manufacturer target is improved, but image quality changes from pre-replacement state and user satisfaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistency with targetVSAvoiduser satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing image quality information at predetermined timings before maintenance occurs. This advance preparation allows the system to have reference data ready for subsequent automatic adjustment, eliminating the need for manual calibration while maintaining both manufacturer target quality and user satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by comparing current image quality against stored historical data and automatically adjusting parameters. This closed-loop approach ensures image quality consistency without requiring manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between maintaining target quality and preserving user satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual calibration is performed by service persons to adjust image quality after component replacement, then image quality reproduction is improved, but time and effort required for adjustment work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality reproductionVSAvoidadjustment work time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically adjusting image quality parameters based on stored historical data and current measurements. This eliminates the need for manual calibration by service persons, significantly reducing adjustment work time while maintaining image quality reproduction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares adjustment parameters in advance by storing image quality information at predetermined timings. This preliminary action enables automatic adjustment to proceed quickly and accurately without requiring manual intervention, resolving the time loss issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If image processing method compares scan data to correct specific images, then specific image correction is achieved, but characteristics of current printer are not corrected and overall image reproduction satisfaction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific image correctionVSAvoidoverall image reproduction quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by storing image quality information at multiple predetermined timings and using this comprehensive data for automatic adjustment. This multi-functional approach allows the system to correct both specific images and overall printer characteristics, ensuring satisfaction across all image reproduction tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing current image quality against historical data stored at predetermined timings. This comprehensive feedback mechanism enables the system to adjust both specific images and overall printer characteristics, resolving the limitation of previous methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If photoreceptor is replaced to solve image defect, then defect is eliminated, but printer characteristics change and image quality changes undesirably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect eliminationVSAvoidimage quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system stores image quality information at predetermined timings before component replacement. This preliminary action creates a reference baseline that enables subsequent automatic adjustment, allowing the photoreceptor replacement to fix defects while maintaining image quality consistency through automated parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to compare image quality before and after photoreceptor replacement, automatically adjusting parameters to maintain consistency. This closed-loop approach enables defect elimination through component replacement while preserving image quality through automated compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250363618A1Image processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US20250363618A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363618A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363618A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To provide an image processing apparatus capable of sufficiently reproducing an image satisfying a user without taking time and labor for adjustment work of image quality reproduction. An image processing apparatus that adjusts image quality of an image formed by an image forming apparatus, the image processing apparatus includes: a storage that stores image quality information on image quality at a predetermined timing after start of use of the image forming apparatus and before maintenance; and a hardware processor that performs image quality adjustment so as to adjust the image quality after the maintenance to the image quality stored.